Sort:  

correct. Anyone can make one now with details why they should be voted for apart from the group~

This will allow [the no airdrop proposal] to serve as the companion to any individual proposals or groups that may come up after the main voting ... saves anyone who chooses to create an additional "for" vote the cost of creating an additional "against"

For some, the groups will be enough, for others, not even close. This is where we as a community now have to do, undo, alter, or support the positions that make the most sense.

Unless I don't get how it works, I don't think many proposals for individuals will get enough support to get enacted.

I'm not really getting the disconnect here. Why can't we make a proposal for or with those few people, plead a good case, and do the doorknocking? That's basically how everything on hive is getting done... just doing it.

I know phare and luke alone mentioned wanting to support only individual appeals that were actually appeals~ We have a baseline chosen by code to make sure people have the transparent actions available as part of their decision making. No one would vote for 300 proposals and the community doesn't know and can't quantify them. But what we can do is simply create the ones that we know as a group (or individuals) that need to be considered separately and make them happen.