The blue paper is only 7 pages I can read it in 10 minutes. If you keep providing generic arguments without substance I will have nothing to argue with.
You said it will fix nothing: are you talking about flagging or reporting abusers? Because both work pretty well and save our precious reward pool
"No one has time to figure the real issues/solutions": do you mind sharing us your insights since you did spend the time. If you're alluding to the whole steem system, then I can agree its not perfect but how is doing nothing better than what berniesanders do?!
Simple.... From the Blue paper, for Dummies!
Rewards for Content Creators and Curators
The exact definition of what Steemit Inc. finds as being valuable content:
The users who produce content are adding value to the network by creating material that will drive new users to the platform, as well as keep the existing users engaged and entertained.
This is to me very clear, valuable content, or content that is adding value to the network is meeting one of those or both criteria:
It is material that will drive new users to the platform.
It is material that will keep the existing users engaged and entertained.
You didn't bring anything new by reading your blue paper. That is the reason why we flag, we disagree on what brings users to the platform and keep them engaged. So far only @ranchorelaxo finds value in @haejin content and that's why he is always on trending. There are countless number of TAs who are better/or same that don't get this reward.
What you think is driving users to the platform I think is actually destroying the platform. If his content is really worth it to be trending. Then let his whale friend stop pumping him and we can see how many users think he's bring anything to the platform.
He doesn't engage with anyone but himself. Look at this circle jerk.
