Infinite / open-programmable "smart contracts" offered by Turing-complete languages isn't the way to go for decentralized networks. I'd personally becareful of all the craziness that has been going on.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Infinite / open-programmable "smart contracts" offered by Turing-complete languages isn't the way to go for decentralized networks. I'd personally becareful of all the craziness that has been going on.
I agree. To many projects out there with no utility whatsoever, to many smartcontracts. The space is evolving tough. There are also positives. There are a lot of projects with utility and there are also a lot of projects with no utility. The ones with no utility will be wiped out eventually and we will see a more safer space for investors. I also think CertiK will bring more security to the good projects out there and we can finally see some trust in the cryptocurrency space. I have no experience in coding, but it seems that you have btw you are talking, so you probably know a lot about the stuff that is going on out there. We will need to wait and see how this will turnaround.
Trust and Turing-complete smart contracts are a contradiction, but this is a very deviant opinion in the scene atm. Just putting it out there! All the best :)
Thanks for the info, will check on that subject. All the best also :)