It makes sense that they should close and even seal it up soon anyway. Still, I feel like it is very unlikely that this facility is solely intended for the publicly expressed purpose. Maybe I'm just cynical, but it seems like a waste of a secure location if nothing of a more sensitive nature is stored there. In addition, for the expressed intent of safeguarding the future food/ecological supply, would it not make more sense to create multiple sites as failsafes against a single one being critically damaged or inaccessible?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: