Will the change in the upvote in HF20 be retroactive for all posts that were already posted and voted, but less than 7 days old?
Does HF20 mean that now the linear time factor increase of 0-30 minutes will decrease to 0-15 minutes?
What does it mean to return to the reward pool?
For the vote to return to the reward pool of its post, or for it to return for the global reward pool, or for it to return to the posts' rewards part of the global reward pool?
Will the change in the upvote in HF20 be retroactive for all posts that were already posted and voted, but less than 7 days old?
I assume not, but not 100% sure.
Does HF20 mean that now the linear time factor increase of 0-30 minutes will decrease to 0-15 minutes?
From what I understand, the reverse auction is 30 minutes and if you vote at 14 mins 50 seconds, you will only return a tiny portion of your vote to the reward pool.
What does it mean to return to the reward pool?
When a vote is cast, a certain amount of rshares are claimed from the reward pool, this represents how much that vote will be worth (which does adjust slightly with how the pool is being currently used). With this change, anything in the first 15 minutes will not be deducted from the reward pool,
For the vote to return to the reward pool of its post, or for it to return for the global reward pool, or for it to return to the posts' rewards part of the global reward pool?
Global reward pool is how I understood it.
I will check to see if I am wrong in these assumptions, but that's how I understand it right now.
No, not unless I stay at a computer 24/7 and watch every window and change how the bot works totally. I have a limit on how much people can bid and in itself cannot get a post anywhere near trending.
Just wondering if there was a curator hired to do the job on the larger ones for a small percentage of the bid. I know it isn't 'your job to judge' but essentially it is an endorsement of the content on the vote. The removal of the vote is a different thing altogether.
What would be interesting is if a bid comes in and is not approved, the curator still takes the small percentage for doing their job. That way, it is more more likely to attract quality posts since there is an actual cost to it. if all large bidbots did the same, not much shit would make it to trending at least considering there will be a range of curators. What it means is that if the curators are somewhat representative of the platform, trending via bidbot would be representative of the community. Trending requires many bots (mostly) to get to trending so if some curators refuse the bid on shit won't have 1500 dollars on it and pointless won't have 300.
Will the change in the upvote in HF20 be retroactive for all posts that were already posted and voted, but less than 7 days old?
Does HF20 mean that now the linear time factor increase of 0-30 minutes will decrease to 0-15 minutes?
What does it mean to return to the reward pool?
For the vote to return to the reward pool of its post, or for it to return for the global reward pool, or for it to return to the posts' rewards part of the global reward pool?
You got a 66.23% upvote from @sleeplesswhale courtesy of @stimialiti!
I assume not, but not 100% sure.
From what I understand, the reverse auction is 30 minutes and if you vote at 14 mins 50 seconds, you will only return a tiny portion of your vote to the reward pool.
When a vote is cast, a certain amount of
rsharesare claimed from the reward pool, this represents how much that vote will be worth (which does adjust slightly with how the pool is being currently used). With this change, anything in the first 15 minutes will not be deducted from the reward pool,Global reward pool is how I understood it.
I will check to see if I am wrong in these assumptions, but that's how I understand it right now.
You got a 100.00% upvote from @luckyvotes courtesy of @stimialiti!
This comment has received a 100.00 % upvote from @steemdiffuser thanks to: @stimialiti.
Bids above 0.1 SBD may get additional upvotes from our trail members.
Get Upvotes, Join Our Trail, or Delegate Some SP
Is it possible for the larger vote orders to manually curate?
edit: before the vote.
No, not unless I stay at a computer 24/7 and watch every window and change how the bot works totally. I have a limit on how much people can bid and in itself cannot get a post anywhere near trending.
Just wondering if there was a curator hired to do the job on the larger ones for a small percentage of the bid. I know it isn't 'your job to judge' but essentially it is an endorsement of the content on the vote. The removal of the vote is a different thing altogether.
What would be interesting is if a bid comes in and is not approved, the curator still takes the small percentage for doing their job. That way, it is more more likely to attract quality posts since there is an actual cost to it. if all large bidbots did the same, not much shit would make it to trending at least considering there will be a range of curators. What it means is that if the curators are somewhat representative of the platform, trending via bidbot would be representative of the community. Trending requires many bots (mostly) to get to trending so if some curators refuse the bid on shit won't have 1500 dollars on it and pointless won't have 300.
▀