You speak as if you feel it is possibly to domestic anyone and everything. I will look at your article, however I feel that you are not being realistic in your reasoning, thus why the "crickets". It all has to do with survival and the protection of the living. Not everyone is interested for sustainable peace and love thy neighbor, but rather conquer, steal and destroy. You article is amusing in perspective, but as far as dealing with reality is very optimistic.
Learn from your mistakes and the failures which have gone before us from those who are now suffering for their kindness on over-reach. Yes as you say control the situation is required, but these people have left their native countries because they refuse to be controlled. A well controlled work program just might be the ticket on a small scale, that is if the situation doesn't get out of hand which it has thanks to Obama's inaction. Better to help them to keep their native homes, don't you think?
One must take care of home and self first before reaching out to others and when reaching be sure not to take on so much of a burden that it causes you and your Family loss. Seldom are those allowed into our homes willing to cooperate with us in our own American ways. So again better to help them to keep their own homes.
As in this my post we can help them to clean up their homeland, to weed out the wicked, to help educate, to provide food, water, clothing and shelter for cooperation in services rendered. There is no place like home until it is over run with savages and then work has to begin to clear them out, to defeat the threat against the living and restore the peace.
Domesticate is not the term that I would choose, but yes, I do believe that non-American humans can be guided toward a better path. And why would they not be?
The silence that this article has met is the natural response by which those of inferior and ulterior perspective and motive given to that which they ae frankly ill-equipped to assault. I do not refer to you here, lest such needed clarifying.
I agree that my outlook on the odds of success are rather optimistic. I am aware of that. I am also aware that if doing whats right by all parties (including ourselves) concerned is to be offered anything more than lip service then I have yet to hear another solution that provides hope for them without shafting us in the process.
In truth, the American situation is far less complex thanks to the geography and geopolitics at play. Mostly Mexicans. Some Cubans. A few other nationalities on expired Visas?
Rather than build a long, and mostly ineffective wall, does it not make more sense to found a benign American foothold south of its borders? One where would-be-migrants would flock for their 'better way of life' for a variety of reasons - including convenience? One which is either American owned or which is a joint American-Mexican endeavor? One which is aimed at using a different economic model upon a smaller scale such as to inspire a positive domino effect upon the whole of Mexico?
One which enriches Mexico while also influencing the situation upon the ground to be more America-friendly than it currently is?
And since the USA has a stake in it, its stakeholders potentially gain... in a far more exemplary fashion than has been going on half-way around the planet in theaters of war where America has been... involved. Also more so than an expensive funding black-hole of a wall.
This is more or less compatible with your (actually correct) notion that "One must take care of home and self first before reaching out to others and when reaching be sure not to take on so much of a burden that it causes you and your Family loss."
I was born in San Antonio, I currently live in SE Oklahoma. So I know what goes on near the southern boarder because I am close to it. I know what kind of people come across it illegally and I also know what they are capable of. I know that they are not all Mexicans or not all from South America but many are from Arab Nations as well as African, Filipino and around the world. It is the underground crossing.
"A City without walls will surely fall." It is about defense, protection and survival. People around here have lost their heads literally while working at canneries by messed up aliens. You keep your head by constantly being on swivel around here lest you pay the price with your life. And this is America, we suffer so because we are only close and not part of Mexico.
Much of what you say can only be speculation because you do not know what happens down here now and during the Obama administration. Real arabic jihad training camps are being built and preparations are being made right now for the war to come.
A "gringo" in Mexico will not live long and if you knew better you wouldn't say half the things you do. You do not understand the situation because you simply do not know, you have never been exposed to it or you would never talk the way you do.
I reside within the Maltese Islands. Population roughly 440K, (or about 1/5th of the US inmate population), and a mass (illegal) migrant population (about an even mix of arabic and african nationalities, I'd guess) of at least 30K - most of whom have arrived over the past 15 years.
Yes, there have been problems, and yes the media sometimes suppresses news of such incidents.
Oh yes... we all live within a space no greater than 320 square kilometers... or 125 square miles... so its not like we can just live in another part of the nation.
The short of it is that while I 'am' relatively ignorant to the situation in Oklahoma US, I am not nearly so ignorant of the impacts of mass artificial migration.
A wall in the US is 'not' going to work nearly as well as a wall in Hungary, becasue unlike the Hungarian case, mass artificial flows of migrants don't have a 'path of lesser resistance'.
It shall prove to be a monumental cost - with a monumental upkeep to go with it. By comparison the Berlin wall will seem like a training exercise - and we all know how that went - the main difference being that that wall divided a single population rather than sought to keep two populations apart.
Nevertheless, I acknowledge that 'perhaps' I underestimate the situation at your southern border. Perhaps you really are dealing with unreformable cut-throat entities devoid of humanity.
Perhaps...
Thank you for the very informative comment in support of protection against un-regulated immigration. Open Boarders = Open Invasion...
We can mostly agree upon that, yes.
However migrants are a symptom of an underlying condition.
Neither the USA nor the EU seem interested in tackling the issues at source. To neutralize the 'spawn points' (to use a little gaming lingo).
Nor do either groups seem interested in even acknowledging that there are 'push and pull' factors at play. Which is a little like approaching an undesirable mathematics result without addressing the variables of the same equation.
The only context where such makes sense is that of two corrupted administrative overseers striving to keep people's minds locked upon the wrong targets and aimed at solving the superficial. This in the interest of harnessing the destabilizing effect that a flow of migrants willing to' do it for less' has upon the bargaining power of the work force - this in the interest of big business. Some nations even instate short-sighted policies of artificial legal mass migration as its "good for the economy" (by who's perspective?).
In conclusion, thank you kindly for taking the time to look through my off-site article. We have similar aims even if our preferred methods and scopes may differ.
The underlying root cause in Syria and other Mediterranean hot spots is the goals of Russia wanting to establish a permanent presence in a warm water port for world domination. At present they have no port of their pwn which does not freeze over in winter. The cost in lives is irrelevant to their goals.
Oil as well as other resources are also being exploited. It's all about the same old narrative of money and power and while such powers exist, there can be no peace...
This is a new slant on the situation, and may indeed at least in part explain Russia's interest in involvement in those theaters of conflict.
It would seem a little easier to aim for the Black Sea - but I do see the bottleneck on the way to the Mediterranean to be a potential problem.
Thank you for sharing this. Its a whole other kettle of fish that frankly deserves its own topic. :c)