Yup that took me by surprise. The mention of Bitcoin at this juncture is to crucial to be ignored as mere coincidence.
Sometimes we underestimate these old men (I certainly do) who live within the bureaucratic and legal circles. The truth is that they have been around for a long time and seen the changes in society over times. They probably know better than anyone else as to what is coming in the future.
Although we also have to keep in mind that US and India have different stance on this issue from day one. Although the optimist side of me will keep its figurative fingers crossed but I am not too confidant in decision going our way, at least for now. But I know that we will win in the long term game and this bear run would be a thing of past in the next couple of years.
I fully agree. However, the changes we are seeing in perceptions of people in the judiciary is very interesting and must be noted. Especially considering the fact that in this case the Bitcoin reference was drafted by a 79 year old judge and supported by other fellow justices who in their career in law must've seen it all and then some!
That's for sure ................I mean even if I am not too optimistic but in the last year or so, crypto has taught me to trust the uncertainty in the world. Anything can happen at this point. Frankly man, I am willing pay bitcoin to see the decision go in our favor :-)
Who knows, maybe the old dudes will come through 😊