Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago (edited) 

    I never intended to not answer your question,but your question is so open ended as to not even be clear that it relates to the article I wrote... see below...

    "Name one person who is a member of the Government?"

    Okay, I'll name one person who is a member of Government -- Mitch McConnell.

    Is that what you wanted? Or, did you want me to name one corrupt member of Government?

    I can do that and much, much more. How about a "List of United States federal officials convicted of corruption offenses"

    Or, how about in Italy? Controversies surrounding Silvio Berlusconi

    Or, a List of political scandals in the United Kingdom

    Or.., or.., or.., I can do this all day if you want? (but, I probably won't... you do know how to use Google... right?)

    Since were playing the Logical Fallacy game how about this, prove to me there isn't a corrupt politician in Government...

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       6 years ago (edited) 
      This is why it is hard to comprehend your post and your attitude. Mitch McConnell is not a member of Government. He is a member of boards for the UNITED STATES INC. Principally one of his Job's it to act like a matador and use a muleta to keep the bulls from seeing the B.S.

      So who is the Government here in America?

      Americans and they represent their power as Grand Jurist and Petite Jurist by deciding the facts of the case and the law of the case. That is right We The People are the forth arm of power and the government.

      Thomas Jefferson said: "I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education.

      The Grand Jury Belongs to The People–Antonin Scalia (1992)

      As proof: Supreme Court UNITED STATES, Petitioner v. John H. WILLIAMS, Jr.
      https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/504/36

      The thing is your a good writer? You could be even better?

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         6 years ago  

        So, that's it? You just wanted to play a game of semantics?
        How ever you classify our elected officials, you know what I was communicating, but chose to ignore it so you could attempt to put me in my place... I chose to ignore your game...

        And, you are the one chose to bring the attitude from your very first post... I just chose to answer in kind... why should I be nice when you're not?

        Oh, BTW... since you got to ask your question, and I answered it...
        Maybe you can do the courtesy of responding to my question?

        "... prove to me there isn't a corrupt politician in Government..."

        $0.00
          Reply
          [-]
           6 years ago (edited) 

          'but chose to ignore it so you could attempt to put me in my place..."

          You put you self in what ever you decide is your place.

          No obviously I didn't choose to ignore you and no it has nothing to do with semantics.

          Your whole comment is a red herring designed to obscure the facts I posted in comments.

          Since you choose to devalue the facts into semantics there is no point. I wont bother you again.

          If you would like I will remove my comments, just let me know?

          $0.00
            Reply