American people have zero to gain by USA going into another country
Middle East or South America it’s not in our interest. We won’t gain anything
We will loose just like in Middle East
Has it? Or has it saved millions of lives? If we didn't stop the Chinese or Soviets and they had their way how many more hundreds of millions of their own people would they allow to die? Consider how many of their own people the Chinese Russians Cubans N Koreans and Cambodians killed and starved in the last century and how America prevented that ideology from spreading. Consider how many people were killed in war before America became a superpower and how many have been killed after, the rate of deaths in war these days is a fraction of what it used to be. Same with famine deaths.
It didn’t save any lives when u break down how many more were destroyed! You are comparing WW2 to bombing Middle East? That’s insanity
Dude how are u anti Soros but pro these wars?
You are spewing the literal propaganda of people like Soros
I am just playing the devils advocate, personally I oppose most wars. More likely in the last century than dying from war was being killed by your own communist government or Nazis.
But seriously
Do u not understand what happens when USA invaded? Libya has slave trades today because we destabilized them , Iraq is destroyed
Millions have died and starved because we invaded . Your saying “so we should let them starve” is a false statement. They will be much worse off if we invade. All u need to do is like T the nations in Middle East and the millions dead thanks to us invading.
And yes the USA did destabilize lybia
It’s admitted not even disputes
Obama’s openly admitted he made a mistake
It was Clinton’s State dep that holds most blame. It’s a fact not even disputed by them
I would agree that America has the resources and ability to try a coup or takeover, as it seems like US governments always seem to have a way to pull its resources despite all its debt! America alone spends about 610 billion on budget while France, China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, India, UK and Japan combined. (https://www.pgpf.org/chart-archive/0053_defense-comparison)
I think the issue would be the potential change that US could potentially bring for Venezuela. While it might bring about a worse change as @blackliberal has mentioned, I think it is also the only way a positive change can happen. What do you guys think? @funbobby51@artgirlnyc
Venezuela would be a great territory, it properly managed its resources are very valuable.
American people have zero to gain by USA going into another country
Middle East or South America it’s not in our interest. We won’t gain anything
We will loose just like in Middle East
Oh, so we should just let them all starve to death?
America acting like the world police has caused millions to die
Has it? Or has it saved millions of lives? If we didn't stop the Chinese or Soviets and they had their way how many more hundreds of millions of their own people would they allow to die? Consider how many of their own people the Chinese Russians Cubans N Koreans and Cambodians killed and starved in the last century and how America prevented that ideology from spreading. Consider how many people were killed in war before America became a superpower and how many have been killed after, the rate of deaths in war these days is a fraction of what it used to be. Same with famine deaths.
It didn’t save any lives when u break down how many more were destroyed! You are comparing WW2 to bombing Middle East? That’s insanity
Dude how are u anti Soros but pro these wars?
You are spewing the literal propaganda of people like Soros
I am just playing the devils advocate, personally I oppose most wars. More likely in the last century than dying from war was being killed by your own communist government or Nazis.
Yes
Obviously I’m being sarcastic
But seriously
Do u not understand what happens when USA invaded? Libya has slave trades today because we destabilized them , Iraq is destroyed
Millions have died and starved because we invaded . Your saying “so we should let them starve” is a false statement. They will be much worse off if we invade. All u need to do is like T the nations in Middle East and the millions dead thanks to us invading.
Oh right, please tell me how we destabilized them and that is why Gadhafi had all those slaves!
He didn’t have slaves
Evidence???
And yes the USA did destabilize lybia
It’s admitted not even disputes
Obama’s openly admitted he made a mistake
It was Clinton’s State dep that holds most blame. It’s a fact not even disputed by them
Not that I think he should have been deposed but saying that there was never slavery in Libya is silly.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2357835/My-ordeal-Gadaffis-sex-slave-Woman-kept-dungeon-used-satisfy-brutal-dictator.html
I would agree that America has the resources and ability to try a coup or takeover, as it seems like US governments always seem to have a way to pull its resources despite all its debt! America alone spends about 610 billion on budget while France, China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, India, UK and Japan combined. (https://www.pgpf.org/chart-archive/0053_defense-comparison)
I think the issue would be the potential change that US could potentially bring for Venezuela. While it might bring about a worse change as @blackliberal has mentioned, I think it is also the only way a positive change can happen. What do you guys think? @funbobby51 @artgirlnyc
I don't know what the military's mission would be there, this is probably all based on fake news.