Note To AnCaps and Libertarians: Preaching Without Proposing Policy Is Not Politics, It Is Masturbation.

I love when "anarchist capitalists" (some even call themselves "market anarchists" lmfaoooo) talk about what they hate that people do, and never propose any policy arrangements. Proposing policy is bad! It's FORCE! COMPULSION! EVIL!!

If you talk about everything you hate, and never promote anything you like or want to see, you are just jerking off on the internet. Socialists propose things like healthcare reform, and then you see the "market anarchists" say they don't want to do the reforms, but also they do the gotcha of "well, I don't like how it is now, either!", but then never expound upon what they want to see. Do they want to eradicate all forms of wealth redistribution? Well, that would take work, effort, and care to do, they just want to talk about what they hate, and never about what they actually want.

Honestly, it's a little cringey. When someone says that single-payer healthcare is bad, and doesn't actually propose a counter-measure, it is de-facto in support of the Status Quo, which they claim they dislike, but they're too arrogant and blinded by a first principle to actually do anything about.

A small observation, I think it's hilarious. This is why the fishook theory is true and accurate.

brave_20191225_175838.png

Read the comments on this stupid-ass post for more of what I'm talking about.
https://steempeak.com/busy/@thecastle/its-a-shame-yang-sucks-and-ubi-is-impossible

Sort:  

Fish hook theory

Cope for when you absolutely need to make it so literally everyone is a Nazi but you.

lol

I don't like how it is now, either!", but then never expound upon what they want to see.

I am a technocrat. So that's my angle personally. That means more automation and adoption of new technologies to solve current day problems. Side stepping governments and just utilizing technology without waiting for some bureaucracy to give me permission.

I love competition.

that doesn't mean anything

See, this is what I'm saying. You don't propose anything, just speculate on "how things will be!" like anyone can about anything.

without waiting for some bureaucracy to give me permission.

Utilizing the technology is all you need to do to destabilize the establishment. When / if I have money to pay people I will be setting up social media. The only way for the proletarian to gain access to the means of production is through decentralized automation.

How do you get that money? Just wait 30 years for steem to inflate? How do kids get that money?

Kids wont need the money after someone gets this stuff in place. For example, literally anyone can make a token on ETH or Steem right now for pennies. The idea is that it costs money to get it functional first then I just release it all for free open source so everyone can just use it how they want.

okay but how do they afford food before the ETH token makes them rich?

Instead of embarrassing your self with how little you know about economics, why don't you do some research first?

Before they make a porn video, they sometimes masturbate. Likewise, if that is what these people are doing, then haha, it is a step in the right direction for some real hot action haha.

It means socialists are Mental lol

what does that mean though

I agree. It's not about whether or not government should propose policy but rather which level of government should. It's a question not of what, necessarily, but rather in how, specifically.

Local vs Federal

It's more of a question of whether policies should be enforced and implemented more on a local level or more on a state, federal, or even international level. I prefer the implementation of the 10th amendment, specifically, in order to minimize the federal government in favor of state and local governments.

Libertarians beleive in downsizing the enournous size and cost of the government. Ending Chroni capitalism and ending the central banking Ponzi scheme.

Libertarians beleive in downsizing the enournous size and cost of the government.

Well, then libertarians should first define what that "enournous size" is. What's too big? What's small enough? Should government be abolished completely? And how do we get it to the size we want?

Ending Chroni capitalism and ending the central banking Ponzi scheme.

Sure, everyone agrees. But do you realize that both of these come into existence by following the free market formula? Making a profit by selling money that's made out of debt is the apotheosis of following the profit motive. So, what do you suggest we do instead of bartering for profits?

Libertarianism is a dead end street. Anarchism is possible, but not with a for profit system, therefore communist anarchists have the right idea at least. Croni capitalism IS capitalism...

ok but how do you do it

This reminds me of a toddler who will endlessly asks "why". I think its time for you to branch out from your cult and learn the truth about Libertarianism

Why don't you tell me how? How and Why are different questions, I know Why. Why is selfishness and neglect. I'm asking How.

The point being is that no matter what answer I give you, you will keep asking "How"

Well considering you've never explained how, this just looks like a cop-out from a delusional child to me.

okay but how do we get there