anarchist = individuals, communist = groups, it's not easy to be both
Anti-fascist, this is stupid because fascism = anarchy + socialism
*(you can't be you and anti-you)
Anarcho-communism,[1][2][3][4][5] also referred to as anarchist communism,[6][7] communist anarchism,[8][9] free communism[10] and libertarian communism,[11][12][13][14][15] is a political philosophy and anarchist school of thought which advocates the abolition of the state, capitalism, wage labour and private property (while retaining respect for personal property, along with collectively-owned items, goods and services)[16] in favor of common ownership of the means of production,[17][18] direct democracy, and a horizontal network of workers' councils with production and consumption based on the guiding principle: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs".[19][20]
...abolition of the state... ... favor of common ownership of the means of production... = no state, but state
...abolition of the state, capitalism, wage labour and private property..
PRIVATE PROPERTY
... favor of common ownership of the means of production...
So, my tools are our tools, my land is our land, my labour is our labour and so on.
.01 STU upvote for clearing that up for me. I am still vehemently opposed to Communism and radical Socialists of any kind. Hey, took an oath saying the same many times. I don't hate the self-identified people, just the mindset. Goes against my oath as a Marine, Soldier, and lifetime member of the American Legion.
No it is not. I think it should be a right. You have me confused. This is the problem in our world today (e.g., I did not vote for Trump, therefore many surmised that I voted for Clinton. I voted for neither, but I voted. I voted for Jill Stein.)
I do not follow party/caucus lines. I think for myself and from time to time my views change and evolve.
I don't like communism, facism, radical socialism (which is communism with a mask), libertarianism (deregulated everything).
I am familiar with all of these isms but not an expert.
There are no simple answers to anything. The only label I would put on myself is maybe a Centrist. Look at both sides of a debate and look for a compromise to solve a problem.
When one side is calling for healthcare (left) and the other is calling to kill brown people (right), how can you be in the middle of that? That's my first question to frame the discussion.
She is an idiot who is making fruit salad:
anarchist = individuals, communist = groups, it's not easy to be both
Anti-fascist, this is stupid because fascism = anarchy + socialism
*(you can't be you and anti-you)
anti-racist, ok, whatever
Conclusion, this is a stupid woman @cyberdemon531
Google would solve a lot of your problems. Search anarcho communism.
Posted using Partiko Android
Nice she-male like definition:
...abolition of the state... ... favor of common ownership of the means of production... = no state, but state
...abolition of the state, capitalism, wage labour and private property..
PRIVATE PROPERTY
... favor of common ownership of the means of production...
So, my tools are our tools, my land is our land, my labour is our labour and so on.
As I said, nice definition of a women with a dick
lol what are you blabbing about? Is English not your native language? What's wrong with dick girls, they're hot.
Hoes mad
Posted using Partiko Android
? ⚒
.01 STU upvote for clearing that up for me. I am still vehemently opposed to Communism and radical Socialists of any kind. Hey, took an oath saying the same many times. I don't hate the self-identified people, just the mindset. Goes against my oath as a Marine, Soldier, and lifetime member of the American Legion.
Socialism and communism are highways to totalitarian states. History is full of examples.
Rojava disagrees
Posted using Partiko Android
So is universal healthcare against your oath? Lol
Posted using Partiko Android
No it is not. I think it should be a right. You have me confused. This is the problem in our world today (e.g., I did not vote for Trump, therefore many surmised that I voted for Clinton. I voted for neither, but I voted. I voted for Jill Stein.)
I do not follow party/caucus lines. I think for myself and from time to time my views change and evolve.
I don't like communism, facism, radical socialism (which is communism with a mask), libertarianism (deregulated everything).
I am familiar with all of these isms but not an expert.
There are no simple answers to anything. The only label I would put on myself is maybe a Centrist. Look at both sides of a debate and look for a compromise to solve a problem.
Also voted for Jill.
When one side is calling for healthcare (left) and the other is calling to kill brown people (right), how can you be in the middle of that? That's my first question to frame the discussion.