Maybe it’s looking at two different price feeds? The slider bar shows me as 49¢ for a 100% upvote, but after I gave one it showed up as 38¢ just seconds later.
I always wondered why it was off. I have also came across times when I upvote a certain person on the slider it would say .007 and at the same time someone else post it would say .012
This is correct.
Ya'll don't remember Convergent linear rewards?
It's a tactic to encourage upvoting "quality content" instead of comments and such... Or, in another man's opinion, it's used to fuck over the little guy.
It also helps "centralize stake so abuse is easier to downvote".
I don’t understand that. It says my upvote was worth .026 I just gave you a full upvote on this comment and it gave .012
Maybe it’s looking at two different price feeds? The slider bar shows me as 49¢ for a 100% upvote, but after I gave one it showed up as 38¢ just seconds later.
I always wondered why it was off. I have also came across times when I upvote a certain person on the slider it would say .007 and at the same time someone else post it would say .012
There is a poor tax at work.
If your vote doesn't reach 20 steem in value it gets reduced on a sliding scale by up to half.
All hail, hf21!
This is correct.
Ya'll don't remember Convergent linear rewards?
It's a tactic to encourage upvoting "quality content" instead of comments and such... Or, in another man's opinion, it's used to fuck over the little guy.
It also helps "centralize stake so abuse is easier to downvote".
convergent linear rewards HF21
see below.