Doubt he is the type to sell out, as he really does genuinely seem to despise TPTB types. Not sure what do make of his stance on EOS or whether it will really promote what it is intended to (at least on the surface).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
OK, so now back to my comment above that Greg Hunter is alt media tool - and a major Zionist tool at that.. So Hunter has on another buddy of his, Mark Taylor. At the end of the interview they are essentially doing virtual high fives that Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Check it out at 24:45:
So what this says to me is that he's another Christian Zionist plant working with Freemason buddies like Mannarino selling snake oil about Trump stopping all the evil attacking the US.
Catch me if I'm wrong, but in the history books I've read, it's the US militarily dominating and acting as the henchman that is stealing from everyone else on the planet, and second only to Israel and the UK in terms of dirty tricks and deeds. So of course, who are the two nations that God is supposedly protecting and making all powerful.. you guessed it the US and Israel.. Let me stop here to vomit a little..
Welcome back! Firstly, I must say smtg about this guest. I never liked him and think he is a complete BS'er, snake oil salesman type. He doesn't back up much of his talk with facts or tangible information, only the "word" from God.
About Greg Hunter. This is definitely his major flaw (defending Israel and never criticizing them). I've actually confronted him a few times on this issue both by email and on his site. Basically, I made him realize that Zionism does exist and that it is at the crux of most of our ills. To further substantiate this, I merely pointed to the fact that one of his best guests was Dr. Paul Craig Roberts who has very often written about the evil Zionists. And I provided him with a link to a Bing search "Paul Craig Roberts" & "Zionist" (or "Zionism"). Greg no longer knew what to see. I had definitely stumped him. That was about a year ago, and I have yet to see Dr. Roberts re-appear on his show (which tells me a lot).
So, I agree with you in large part about Greg and his stance supporting Israel and never putting any blame on Zionists. (Which are two completely different things which I've previously sated in a previous post of mine).
To give him some credit, however, he still has a lot of good quality guests (e.g., Kevin Shipp, Bill Holter, and others) who help to expose a lot of crap. He also pointed us to an ex-FBI agent that demonstrated how Deep State Mueller had usurped and corrupted the agency).
Let's face it, each and everyone out there has their faults.
But I still think it is better to have these guys in aggregate as the net result is a lot of exposure to these bad actors and agendas.
What is the alternative? They all shut up / close down and thousands less get informed? It ain't perfect, but besides us small minnows it's all we got to work with. So do, pls try to keep positive and hopeful.
Cheers
Thanks a lot for the comments! I would disagree (as you probably expected already), but let me try to explain better why. The term "gatekeeper" is a very appropriate one because what these guys try to do is keep people from figuring out the bigger picture as well as the really important players involved. Even worse, they try to get people cheering for a number of the bad actors and actions including the Zionists, the military, the current government, and whatever other BS they can insert.
Now considering the size of the truth community out there, don't you think that if all these pricks were rejected by the masses for being the manipulating and blackholing asswipes they are, that other good alt media guys would pop up to the surface instead? In other words, you are currently presupposing that because you get rid of the bad apples with worms in them, that there are no apples left to eat.. This isn't true.
I've been looking around lately for people that do really good research and really good news stories and I've found a number of them, but they don't get big followings..why?.. because the other fake pricks with slicker videos and bigger budgets suck up their likely audiences instead.
And regarding the guys you mention like Bill Holter, Kevin Shipp, and others like them. Let's remember that these guys don't require to be seen all the time because they always have pretty much the exact same messages. Instead, you want refreshing new guests that do great research. Have you ever wondered why none of these crappy channels provide that? Do you think it's just because they can't find anybody else to have on? Isn't there a reason that none of them ever have really insightful guests that cover important history or deep research into current events?
I think we are being totally played and we shouldn't settle for dumbed down and Pied Piper content as an alternative. No one needs this.. not even the those that aren't really woken up yet, because what is it that these fake media actors are providing that's really worth waking for?
So guys that are telling the truth are ones like Matthew North and Jake Morphonios. I'm sure there are a lot more of them too, but they at least follow the research and facts and lay them out very clearly. This is exactly what a real journalist is supposed to do..
Hello my friend. You've made some good points. I didn't know about Matthew North so will look into him (which is his main platform?). I do like Jake Morphonios and have referenced him as well. I like the way he researches and presents verifiable facts (e.g., Genie Energy). What are your thoughts on Luke from We are Change, Rob Kirby, and Dan Dicks (Press for Truth)? Any red flags on these guys? And who else to you like to help spread the truth and seem to be in the legit club?
Firstly, I'll leave you an excellent Matthew North example here below:
It's real research and very insightful commentary.. what journalists are supposed to do!
Regarding the other guys you've mentioned, I think Luke is a scammer. He acts like he's some people's guy by travelling around sticking microphones in people's faces, but it's all just an excuse to get paid to travel everywhere and never actually provide any insightful content.
I like Rob Kirby. Rob is extremely knowledgeable and very experienced in the financial industry. Rob is no journalist, he's just a guest on these shows, but he's great to have on every so often when he has something new to say.
I'm not sure about Dan Dicks, but everytime I see one of these Canadian alt media guys, the thought of Rebel Media goes through my head and wonder if they are working with them directly or indirectly. I'd say EVERYONE that was ever associated with Rebel Media (other than MAYBE the ones that exposed them) is a shill, a gatekeeper, and a hard core Zionist. To be fair, I really don't know about Dan Dicks, and would need to do some more research on him to say anything.
Although Dan Dicks calls out Rebel Media in a video, he also paints Lauren Southern as some poor victim - she's not. Yet there are lots of exposés on the ex-Rebel media reporters like Laura Loomer, Lauren Southern and their friends like Tommy Robinson that you can watch. They all appear to be controlled opposition to me. Essentially Zionist shills running the alt right alt media circuit and acting like they are free and independent when most likely they are answering to Mossad psy-op agents somewhere down the line. (Mossad is definitely interested in painting all the Muslims as dangerous through these alt media guys while their ringleader George Soros is still pumping them into Western countries through his NGOs. Once again running both sides..)
Hi again my friend @newsandviews. I have a favor to ask you. There has been a recent event for which I need your much more critical eye (than mine).
There's a post on this recent event that took place in Arizona whereby they found what would appear to be a child trafficking camp. There's a Steemit article here entitled Abandoned Camp in Tucson AZ discovered by Vets On Patrol, a complete overview with photos and links.
There appears to be some strange things that just don't add up. Please have a read at this post and then my comment below it.
Not sure if you are familiar with Mr. Craig Sawyer (from Veterans for Child Rescue). I've been listening to some of his videos and appearances in the last year or so and he had seemed legit to me. But after the post of Steemit user (the one for which I replied with my comment) some red flags popped up in my mind. Please put him through your critical lens and let me know your thoughts as to whether you think he is legit or is a phony psy-op operative.
Also, any merit to the claims Mr. Steven D. Kelley makes in his video?
Cheers man. Peace.
I get the impression that Jeff will definitely sell out whenever it affects his wallet. If he's got a boatload of EOS, you can be damn sure he'll push it hard. Will he still bitch about TPTB?..sure, but he'll burn others by selling them crap if he needs to to make himself whole.
I'm also pretty damn sceptical of the whole anarcho-capitalist spiel. TPTB love to take the extremes on both sides of any debate. If they run communism (and they do), you can be damn sure that they run the anarcho-capitalist push as well.
I have a lot of reasons to perceive anarcho-capitalism as complete BS. Have you ever listened to the religious ones try to explain how some of the the most basic government activities are supposed to run in their model..it's a total joke. It will never work. Now this of course doesn't mean government shouldn't be minimized to the maximum degree and be massively controlled by the people.. absolutely it should. However, the fantasy that anarcho-capitalism is a workable system is ridiculous.