Gee, why would Kamala say something like that?
If you're liberal, you aren't going to appreciate my perspective. It'll be uncomfortable to consider the other side's point of view, but I'm hoping that you, dear reader, are the truly open minded sort who can indeed entertain another perspective without agreeing, especially when it comes to statements and claims being backed by various (non Infowars!) sources. Sometimes, it's right from that person's mouth.
What I'm going to do is paint a picture using precedents already set and documented. What you do with that picture is up to you; forget about it, research it, ignore it... that's all up to you. I do hope you'll opt for researching for yourself, but I won't hold my breath. From my own observations over the past three years, I have come to the conclusion that Americans, as well intentioned as they may be, have difficulty shedding their programming to go on a quest of discovery. Not when there's family, work, celebrities, sports, technology, social media, and other distractions servings as carrots on a stick to keep one's mental trajectory far away from notions such as government abuse and social engineering on a grand scale.
Like a taco with sunglasses upon a unicorn in space, you don't have to believe it's real to entertain the notion. That's called a narrative. A story. Language is important, and one must consider how it can be manipulated, most especially in this day and age of digital manipulation, where edits can reverse sentiment in a heartbeat. Due to that horrific truth, one must try and vet information, and understand that those in positions of authority-- especially authority which is being challenged, will use whatever they have available in their narrative arsenal to sway public opinion in favor of whatever is being propagandized. When one is aware of that notion, it gives fodder for the consumer to ponder; if multiple sources are repeating the same thing over and over and over, without significant deviation (as would occur if all those articles were written by seperate people with their own analysis of the information) one can consider that all those so-called journalists were given a script to use.
Consider that the Smith-Mundt Act repeal permits the use of government propaganda on a domestic population. That isn't opinion; it's fact. In 2013, the law which forbade the use of propaganda on American citizens on American soil got hucked in the trash and lit on fire. That is your first clue that anything from mainstream media is to be questioned on all fronts-- because we know they have carte blanche to lie their asses off, with State Department approval.
Now consider who was running the State Department at the time of the repeal; it wasn't Trump who was president in 2013.
Now consider how shady things are done in government; three letter agencies can't roll up to Congress and ask for gas money so they can go usurp a democratically-elected government overseas. Why would they want to do that? Resources. Not just minerals and wood and things of that nature, but other, highly profitable resources.
Perhaps Trump's campaign of ending corruption (and if you've been studying the shady deep state shenanigans of guns, drugs, human/sex/organ trafficking, then you know it's a multi-billion dollar cash cow those profiting off can't afford to lose) was a step too far for some. Could it be that Obama declared Trump would never win, yet Trump did, and is a wrecking ball destroying the system in which the corrupt flourish? Trump's balls are so big he roasted the corrupt in public in such a way they just gotta endure the harsh truth and play it off a a joke.
And because lying to the American people is now a profitable career choice, those in the media who habitually hobnob with the political elites help cover up the corruption. One needs to look no further than the Russia! Did it! narrative to see the path of bullshit laid down to cover up the fact that blaming Russia for supposedly hacking the DNC email server means no one is paying attention to what those emails contained-- which holds the truth about what's going on, in opposition to what we're told is going on by media personalities.
We are living during a time of record amounts of sealed indictments, mass resignations, and proliferation of citizen journalism due to mainstream media's concerted effort to not report reality. No greater illustrator of this point than news media's claim that Hillary Clinton would win the election hands down, no questions asked. And they were wrong. And ever since that point, there's been a drive to impeach Trump because his wrecking ball promises to destroy, and his efforts to drain the swamp really piss off those making the most bank from corruption.
A refresher of non-debatable facts for those hung up on the Russia! Did It! Narrative:
Bill Clinton asked Donald Trump to run for president in 2016. {source}
Hillary Clinton's camp asked the media to give Trump a spotlight in their epically-failed "Pied Piper" strategy. {source}
The Media ran with the "Pied Piper" strategy, going so far as to show Trump's empty podium for half an hour rather than cover a Bernie Sanders speech. {source}
Because Hillary scared the shit out of people, she was promised the Democratic Nomination (ponder this: when Obama won in 2008, the then-leader of the DNC was Tim Kaine, who went onto becoming Hillary's running mate. Head of her failed campaign, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, became head of the DNC. Talk about hedging one's bets.) and everything the DNC did was political theatre to cover up the lack of democracy from the Democratic party. Officially, the DNC stole the primary from Bernie Sanders.{source}
Hillary literally stole the Democratic Nomination and Trump got a whole lot of new followers who were joyful he wasn't a Clinton. {source}
Emails from the DNC were released to Wikileaks. According to the person who handed Assange the thumbdrive, the source was not Russian. {source}
To deflect the fact that there was a leaker, the DNC blamed Russia, yet never handed their servers over to the FBI for forensic investigation. {source}
There was a concerted effort by the Obama DOJ to not go after Hillary Clinton's abuse of classified information, going so far as the Attorney General (appointed by Bill Clinton) tried having a secret meeting on a tarmac in Phoenix with Bill Clinton...which is awful shady, considering Hillary was still under investigation at the time. {source}
Wikileaks Vault 7 Release shows that the C I A has programs that can leave a Russian "fingerprint" on digital media such as images and emails. {source}
An hour after the DNC documents which were claimed to be hacked by Russians were created by a fellow by the name of Warren Flood.{source}
Or to sum it up in a meme:
So after all that, our takeaway is that shady shit was being done across the board and that the so-called "Department of Justice" actively sought to cover it up. Because if it was revealed, We the People would get so damn upset that we'd revolt against the depth and breadth of their corruption. Hillary was supposed to win, to help keep the corruption hidden. But she lost, and unlike Al Gore, she didn't fade away gracefully into the night. As Secretary of State, she oversaw the toppling of nations and the flourishing of open-air slave markets, and most likely worse. And if it comes to light that all this shady, shady shit was happening on their watch, well, it's not a good look. And when it comes to light that shady shit was being done to American citizens on American soil... it looks even worse.
There's a reason Russia was blamed. And that reason wasn't Russia.
Ever notice that everytime FISA Declass gets mentioned something bad happens? Shootings, bombings, wildfires... and they'll continue until they either get arrested, kill us all, or run out of ammo.
If one ignores, one enables. Is that the world you want to live in? A world where evil is permitted to live in the shadows while you're distracted by cheap sparkly things? Once you understand the attacks on Trump are based on what he's outing, you will be better prepared for the reality of mass awakening of our invisible slave bonds of distraction.