with bitchute you are doing again the same mistake... there is only one way to defeat the childrapists/gmopusher/forcedvaccination/antico2/emfspreaders/anitfreespeech crowds, it's simply to use open source decentralized systems.
For example there is freenet, i2p, ipfs
https://ipfs.io/
https://freenetproject.org/
https://geti2p.net/en/
https://www.qbittorrent.org/
https://livepeer.org/
or simply upload on bittorrent, there are a lot of livestreaming software for it :).
so why wanting to get back again in a ghettos? do you understand that bitchute is under the juridisction of the crown of england? do you understand that thousands of girls have been raped in england? do you understand what evil you preach here?
any system relying on single access point will be raided by the force of the childrapists...
please help me understand your mindset...
I recommended BitChute for two primary reasons:
The fact that it is based in the United Kingdom is concerning given the UK's government seeming wanton zeal for censoring people (I'd include the despicable treatment visited upon Tommy Robinson among some of the other issues you've already identified).
BitChute is actually a peer-to-peer platform, it is based on WebTorrent.
I do support projects that are less centralized that BitChute, such as DTube, but I don't know of another platform that has enjoyed adoption by creators more than BitChute, which, while unfortunate, is key to functioning as a proper surrogate to YouTube.
Ultimately, with the censorship issue, it seems unlikely a truly decentralized platform is possible with today's internet infrastructure. Someone has to register a domain and host the website's code, which is always going to introduce a degree of centralization even in blockchain based projects.