Most definitely. That is the correct way to look at it, if you are looking at it from the legal perspective. However, if you look at it from a lawful (or Constitutional) perspective, then his right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Had he allowed the police to capture him, it would no doubt have resulted in jail time. This, for the victimless crime of carrying arms in America. I can see both sides of the argument, it is unfortunate I have to engage in doublethink to do so.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: