"It's not about ego and I hope he does save children but you know what don't let a few token saved children distract you from the real war.." - source
Thanks for that video, even this guy apparently thinks that he may be in the business of saving children, which to me if he is saving children means that he's not a fraud. Yet then this guy goes on to say that they were 'token saved children' and I'm like WTF!?
Since when is a child saved a token act? I'm confused because towards the end he makes this whole thing about occupying the getty (not sure if that's spelled correctly).
So he's salty at Sawman for not wanting to occupy the getty or allegedly dismissing the idea as lunacy. Then he goes on how to talk about him not wanting to protest billionaires. So I'm guessing the getty whatever that is may be owned by billionaires?
It seems to me like he's trying to goad Sawman into endorsing or participating in some kind of stunt that may or may not hamper the release of his film. It could interfere with the release if Sawman were to be arrested for conducting an illegal occupation of private property.
Maybe they have a simple disagreement on style as far as how to fight the problem of white slavery in this country. This guy seems to want to go with a big PR type push and Sawman seems to be comfortable with boots on the ground plus PR with Contraland.
Update: I comprehend now. Steven D. Kelley appears to believe that under a museum in L.A. there is a large city where child trafficking is going on.
He believes in this because someone he knows had "remote viewed" it... If you watch this video of his you can learn all about his many theories and opinions where he goes on to stitch together as many of the more far out there conspiracies as he can into one large tapestry of... lunacy.
Hell, I'm open to being wrong about this but saying the proof is that someone remote viewed it, well, that gives me nothing to research. Those kinds of claims pray on either people's faith or their gullibility.