Nicely written and good details :)
my next contribution for the information war will be a short podcast that will highlight the dangers of listening to emotional appeals, and how data and facts are needed to see situations clearly and context matters. If we cannot state the facts and context and use data, we cannot actually solve a problem. Also, by using data context and facts we can determine if something is a problem, that is something many people are not doing. For example, the narrative about cops shooting unarmed black people is wrong. Statistically more white people are shot and killed by cops by a higher rate. Those shootings are "justified" at a very high rate, somewhere around 95%+ or something like that. So the unjustified shootings(cops illegally shot someone who wasn't a threat)are really low and are less than 100 per year. Out of 330million people that is a very insiginificant number, your chance of dying in a car accident is tens of thousands of times higher. But to a normal average person who watches news, listens to news, they don't have this data for a comparison. I will make these comparisons to show that it isn't a problem and the media is hyping things up. That is the context part we need more of, nobody is protestin driving cars despite them killing tens of thousands of people vs 100 people being unjustly killed by cops. Stuff like that!
I guess, "narrative descontruction" or something along those lines.
make sure it goes under the infowar tag, and looking forward to it!