it must be understood that private education as it is conceived at present does not change the paradigm previously established in the previous example, since under the system of private education, the educational program, that is, what is to be taught to the students, is not decided by the students, but is decided by the State, which greatly limits the power of choice that may have the student.
Very well said. I've had private tuition and the only times I was properly satisfied were the parts of the curriculum that I enjoyed or completely private institution created curriculum (generally in IT).
I remember that it took me no more than 10 seconds to solve it mentally, then she asked me to go to the blackboard and explain to all my answer, which had been correct, my method was unorthodox, so he asked me to formulate it
Add physics, chemistry and mathematics to the list. Sometimes I've solved problems in few lines or just in my head while other write more than a page. I had some smart teachers who smile past me and simply cut my marks at the tests and tell my parents that I'm a really smart kid, but not fit for the system.
Even though I had already developed an adverse thought towards the education system, I decided to study law at the university
I had some of my AFK friends do similar things. They say they learnt many important things but burred under what is mostly just drivel. Even when it comes to areas that seem impossible to fill with fluff and drivel, these educational sucker manage to expand 1-1.5 year course into 3 years (based on what my programmer friends say)
oops, I'm sorry I've extended the comment so much.
I'm cool with extended comments :-)