I can actually prove it to you that scientific consensus is a thing. I am sorry for coming up with the proof so late in our discussion. I had failed to notice that scientific consensus was substantiated by Wikipedia.
Thruout our discussion you failed to show evidence that you understand how science (scientific consensus) works. You also failed to show that there is a corresponding consensus in religion. In religion, to the best of my knowledge, there is no consensus on the role of Jesus, existence of God, nature of magic, nature of life and so on.
My conclusion is, then, that science is driven by consensus, whereas there is no equivalent consensus in religion.