data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32419/324190f938acce7bc9c39021a3824c23e24ff92e" alt=""
Now the tone of this article, may be a tad bit more casual, its very much a “pub discussion” I generally try to steer away from overt conspiracy topics that I already know to be not true, however, there is a method to my madness with this one and you will be pleasantly surprised, I am sure. This one, you all will find particularly interesting, and I very much doubt, most of you, have ever actually thought about it.
So, I was an insurance guy right? and any case you get, you work the case right, because you have to, to make sure that your in compliance with the PDS to see if you indemnify or don’t indemnify the claim, now regarding rural policies, I don’t actually know the process personally, although I was briefly, for like, a week or so, pretty into Crop Circles right, because some of my online friends were playing Farm Simulator, I thought that was not to my tastes and was not playing but in the vein of the theme, at the time, I looked into crop circles in what they call in corporate a bit of a “deep dive” because why? Something to do while you’re sitting around talking with your mates on Discord.
Now - straight up, I would go so far as to say 90% of them are not real, The people that make them are quite talented, talented beyond belief, farmers with a hobby or something yeah - would love to pick their brains about it sometime, they are very talented people that make those things I assure you, and we have proven that most of them are fake, there are however a lot of ones that still perplex us however.
If, you’re a rural policy insurer, and someone did crop circle damage to your property, you would have to call the insurer and claim for it right? because loss of crops is a claimable event, as is damage to property.
So, logically, just, pure logic and reason - I assume, one day, or perhaps several times, all these rural insurers claim guys and gals have got crop circle phone calls, which means, they would have had to subsequently investigate it.
Which, given the other percentage of the time, which, I logically assume, is just our own advance aircraft that are at times involved, with a big question mark over that last little bit of a percent we don’t understand.
Which would mean, there would be claims handlers, front line claims handlers, who actually have been exposed, to massive amounts of data on top secret military aircraft, because, they would have to be briefed, and therefor would have had to document the knowledge, because otherwise, how would you ever know if you are indemnifying the claim or not?
And strictly speaking, from an insurance law point of view, who would you be claiming from?
Both, are interesting concepts, because it means either
A. no one has ever thought about that before, or
B. There are database security back doors and security clearances in the rural insurance sector.
Let me break it down for you, so it makes logic and rational sense, not like a conspiracy theory, which I get it does at a glance, I really do – this is not tin foil hat, think it through.
Let’s just say, hypothetically, some dude, comes on your farm, and does crop circle stuff, for whatever reason and motivation, fine - you call the insurer, if you’re the insurer, you need to understand what happened in the incident, in order to properly assess the claim
Questions an insurer must logically ask, particularly in todays climate of ideas, logically, from a legal position, would be:
Was it a vandal?
Was it the government (for whatever reason)?
Was it something else?
To name but a few, ideas, on what, obviously, as an investigator, would result in quite a long list of possibilities, given the strange nature of the claim.
As an investigator you logically and reasonably, need to investigate that, in order, to be compliant with the law, in order to understand if you are going to indemnify the claim.
Logical conclusions to outcome, when designing a process chart, or procedure would then be something along the lines of:
Was it a Vandal? - if so, then it must go through the vandal’s public liability insurance (assuming they have it)
Was it the government (For whatever reason) - if so, it must go through the insurer of the relevant associated body, for that type of event, just like every other type of claim.
Was it Something else? - Well, if it was, then it must go through their insurance company, logically in just the same way, that countries, claim from other countries, via their national insurer.
From an exo-political point of view, that will be exactly the same with planet to planet, species to species, now the question is, from a national security point of view, I very much hope, that all our respective governments of the commonwealth and our friends have considered, that if you have never actually plugged that, or thought about that, you have, a massive, database of information that I’m sure has been gathered about top secret avionics over the past? what, however long all of that has been going on.
Extrapolate that line of thought out however you will.
I will probably, get a lot of people that think that’s a bit tin foil hat, but if you actually stop for a moment, and break down what I said, strictly speaking, from a factual point of view, it makes total logical sense.
If I choose, to indemnify or not indemnify a claim, my client, is going to ask me why, are they not? and legally, I can’t tell that client "I don’t know" you need to provide the client with a legal answer, or if not, pass them in touch with someone who can, provide that legal answer (much like warm transferring a call to the legal department etc)
I guarantee many of you, have never even thought about that for a second, have you?
Pretty cool huh?
And I might point out, all based in logic, reason, science, nothing conspiratorial about that, just straight up investigative deduction and insurance law processes, and if they don’t exist, you should probably invent those things, invariably they will be required eventually even if its only interplanetary stuff between ourselves.
Probably going to need to invent an insurance company one day to I suppose, something is going to have to insure those logistics ships to help with supply chain wont it?
This is why these various military conflicts around the world, are silly at the moment I think, if I am thinking of things like this, why are you all not thinking of things like that, we could be doing this kind of stuff, but no, were arguing about silly little things that don't matter in the grand scheme of things!