any kind of number on the ROI ? do you leave messages ? i often send some sbd to the @isnochys for random posts from random people on my feed, if that came with my name on it that would be even better .. ?
not trying to bust your balls here, just need to know what i'm buying lol ... i assume the max nr of incoming votes would be 100 then ? can you provide a list per bid per post so i can filter it out in my supermegacalculator like i would with smartsteem ?
league of technical voters
seriously, lots of people think im breaking them down when asking questions, thats not it, mo bots mo better mo options (i mean useful bots ofcourse, not cheetah or the magic 8ball), its not facebook after all or the english bookstore, its the paradigm blockchain :p
and also, do you accept steem i.o. sbd , its a lot easier to track win or loss in steem than it is in sbd due to the fluctuating ratio
just asking .. :) if i were to use it for myself i would need to get more than i give but i understand the concept
You won't get a positive ROI with @interfecto, this bot is for buying many cheap votes, not for profit. And yes, I leave messages with the name of the sender. I accept Steem, they are converted to SBD using the current market rate.
that's super-awesome, so the minimum is actually 1 sbd for 1 vote and you can pick the number of votes by the amount sbd you send yourself ?
that's gonna come in handy i'm gonna try it right now, refund policy and all that , not a "if you're blacklisted we will steal your money and send it to steemcleaners, sounds fine to me to give some minivotes out random to people on my feed :))"
Exactly, you can pick the number of votes with the amount you send. Each minivote costs 0.001 SBD, the maximum bid is 0.1 SBD for 100 votes. On top of that I always give a free vote from my own account that is worth something.
i noticed, thanks, i'm starting to think you got like a hundred accounts hahah ... nothing wrong with that ofcourse, its steemchain, not facecoin, it should be used to its potential, i expect to have about 20 accounts by 2020 the way things are going, price or not, its just way too
i dont know, i havent really programmed in years since i found out about condenser
I used a bug introduced by a quick fix right after hard fork 20 that ignored negative resource credit balances and allowed to claim huge amounts of discounted accounts, it took only two lines of code to claim 150 accounts and I could have claimed even more :D Some witnesses did the same actually.
I created 95 accounts and still have many discounted account creation tokens to create new accounts for free. Programming for Steem is fun!
oh @interfecto, is there a maximum post age or anything else i should be aware of ?
the way i see it :) --> smartsteem already can provide a load of votes and they're useful BECAUSE they don't leave a message, but your is useful for advertising mine just because it DOES :) its something new then plus i can add a specific number of real outside votes to stresstest @goldmanmorgan specifically ...
that sounds great, i'll see what it does :p
No maximum post age (except for the 7 days restriction imposed by the Blockchain) and no blacklist - since this bot is for promotion and not for ROI these measures are not necessary :)
i like that ... next-gen people who don't work under the steemcleaner cartel is what we need here, a lot more of them
thanks for answering , and fast too lol
wish you the best, prices arent really what they could be, as someone recently said to me " i dont think they have a marketing department upthere " :p
@steemcleaners is not so bad after all and in my opinion needed to keep the few original content creators who create valuable content on Steem on the platform, but there are certainly things to criticize - why do they flag small accounts but let big stakeholders like zer0hedge and berniesanders get away with the same type of plagiarized/short posts for reward farming? Seeing this unequal treatment puts many new users off, also, Steem has the potential to be far more than the platform for original content it is now. There is value in sharing content! Dmania was good until everyone started complaining about how "plagiarized" memes earned more than original content and then they only upvoted boring original memes. I prefer a meme reposted from reddit or 9gag that makes me laugh over a boring original meme..
Imagine how awesome it would be if you could post any content with a source and the original author would automatically be set as beneficiary if the source account (reddit/instagram/medium/..) or source website is linked (verified) to an existing Steem account and if not, the beneficiary would be a trustee account for example managed by steemcleaners - instead of flagging shared content and putting off new users this would encourage original authors to create a Steem account to claim their pending rewards and in the end everyone would profit: Users get rewards for sharing good content instead of being flagged by steemcleaners, the original author gets rewards and Steem gets more good content that attracts new users