That is not how the law works. The law tries to regulate and govern conduct of society. Eventually the dogma of legislation falls behind the status quo's thinking on what is ethical and civil, so the most necessary adjustments to the law are made. Bureaucracy, litigation, "red tape" are all expensive and very limiting to decentralized operations seeking to progress the growth of crypto-currency as a legitimate solution to global problems. So there is definitely a need within crypto commerce, so even if @jury.online just became the official legal process for decentralized businesses, THAT WOULD BE ENOUGH. As this poses the possibility for more accurate "blind" justice, it can be assumed that most forward thinking businesses and individuals will opt-out of traditional contracts and go with something less costly to enforce, and if an agreement written on a napkin can stand-up in a court of law, then you can be certain this will as well, except it's self executing so keep your dated judgment process through bias-based juror selection, I rather be governed by protocol and blind expert consensus.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: