Okay, well, that's like your opinion, man. The people who've made a lot of stake aren't active here anymore. I could easily just automate everything I do and do the same but I try to treat this platform the same way I did before I had any power to curate with.
Yes it's correct. And that is certainly commendable. And that's why I have avoided putting you in the same bag with others. Well, at least not so often. LoL
Yup, @nonameslefttouse sure is one who don't use to shy away from speaking his mind no matter the stake behind the person he's speaking to. And this is exactly how we should all be. Without exceptions!
As for all the other 'genuine activity' he (or whoever) puts onto the chain, there couldn't be a more subjective thing than that to evaluate and qualify in someone. Especially when we undoubtedly ignore about 98% of what really is behind of what most actually do behind the scenes. Both, for the chain and for the benefit of all who inhabit it.
I also know he wasn't someone who kept complaining that his early posts didn't get enough rewards and make that the highlight of his content and complaints.
Yep, that's true. He didn't. It's not his style because he is still too young & nice. But in my opinion, someone has to do it. But not for selfish or personal reasons. That would be absolutely useless and stupid. But because definitely someone has to turn out to be the spokesperson of so many others who feel incapable or do not know how to say what needs to be said for multiple reasons. Like for example, because they think they have something to lose if they say so. Ignoring what they really are losing and have already lost precisely by not saying what needs to be said on time.
It's very probable that I as an old man who has already seen enough. One who definitely feels as if he already has accomplished his mission in his long life. One who is now retired, alone and basically without any more responsabilities than only care for himself. Tends to opt and likes to assume publicly this "spokesperson" role simply because he can and also prolly because has much less to lose in his short way out to the exit door. Yeah, to whoever in a similar situation I reckon it's way more easy to do it and that's exactly what I'm doing.
It's not the first time I'm saying this. I said this multiple times before. Last time was exactly 11 days ago. But yeah, who could have noticed? Especially among the whales and affluent curators who don't read and what is even worse, they are not even the ones who vote because 'something' or someone else is voting with their "curation" accounts?
Anyway, no one's entitled to post rewards, doesn't matter how long they've been here.
I agree! That is obvious, evident, tacit and understood. Anything else, is just pure fantasy and delusions of positive thinking.
All that matters is connections and how you connect with people and other ways you contribute to the chain.
Connections. Yeah, connections! That's only provisional and temporarily useful exclusively for young people. At least in these virtual realms while these last. };)
You seemed to want to connect with other people I didn't see hand to hand to on their view of things or entitlement of rewards.
For me, it's pretty clear that I want to connect mostly with people who has no problem to spit out their minds exactly as they conceive them in their brains. In other words, their truth. Right or wrong is always to be seen. And that all will be always subject to debate. As I said several times before, socially speaking, I praise and I'm always on the lookout of genuineness and authenticity.
Aside from that I'm not the only one with big votes so there must be some reasons others haven't decided to support you more consistently than my own reasons.
You are right again. And this remark is another indisputable truth. But I observe that you still tend to forget that all those with big votes, all of them share the same biased mindset suffering of the very same syndrome of lack of sense of humor as to be able to understand and support my perspectives and viewpoints more consistently. If at all.
Many chaps around here may see what mostly is loud & clear constructive criticism that needs to be addressed, treated and corrected as complaints. But yeah, never forget it's only when they feel alluded to in some way on what they perceive as something negative about their own acting and public performance which only resides in their own confused minds. :)
You're funny.