The problem is also that people vote on posts to get curation reward, not if it's a quality post. If a post doesn't have many upvotes the first 30 minutes others wont vote even if it's really good. Then if someone post a cellphone photo and buy an upvote it could get 500 more votes in 10 minutes. I still believe in steemit but right now it's idiotic!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree with you friend
Honestly, I'm looking around Steemit and I'm quite excited to start posting here. But where is all the good content? Where's all the art?
Maybe in #art?
@juliakponsford curates a list of art on Steemit, might start there. I also follow @trufflebot to get a list of (usually) quality content that didn't make the front page.
Welcome!
As one toying with the idea of throwing myself wholeheartedly into producing what I immodestly regard as quality content, I too am finding it hard to find too much of real quality among the torrents of dross. Of course one man's meat is another's poison, and nobody should be criticized for doing their best, but it does seem thin on the ground. Certainly on the Trending page, though maybe by ferreting around we'll find more than we imagine.