@officialfuzzy I am only responding because you commented.
What claim that the names are similar and that the concepts are similar? So is DTube, and I am sure plenty of other platforms. There are distinct differences however and when it's all said and done all video platforms will be decentralized. Ours provides more rewards to our community as a whole and our coin has a lower cost for entry = FACTS
At the end of the day, we are a legitimate company, with legitimate tech, providing a legitimate value proposition to our community, and @furion despite being a respected content creator and member of the steemit community also clearly has vested interest in the success of Viewly , which means his claims have malicious intent.
Regarding the website domain nonsense. That is just business, but out of respect for the steemit community and you I will provide clear and transparent insight into it once and for all. We have owned our domain and been working on our platform since 2014, but transferred our domain temporarily in September to an investor to oversee the ICO process. Once the ICO is over the domain ownership is transferred back to us.
Here is the proof
The fact that we even have to go this in-depth is both pathetic and I guess a testament to the steemit community's due diligence.
Can we leave it at that or do we have to address more lies? When they go low, we go high, but please don't doubt we have more proof of corrupt sleazy practices by Viewly and @furion trying to hurt our ICO (IT'S INSANE).
You haven't addressed any of the concerns above, but are rather steering the narrative with pointless distractions and ad-hominem attacks.
For one, why did you name your project
Viulywhich sounds likeViewly?You show up out of nowhere, and somehow we should believe its just a coincidence that you:
@furion we now understand why you have been so adamantly attacking us. We were not aware that you were actually the creator of the viewly platform. The name issue was addressed above with documentation showing we have had our domain name since 2014 not in any way to be like your site (which didn't exist yet), but because English is not the only language in the world and for our initial target demographic "viu" instead of "view" was more adequate, case in point:
As for our relation to steemit, since the announcement, we have been working with our development team to see how smart media tokens could be integrated within our platform to provide even more value to users. This is why we decide to join the steemit community. However our main focus has always been to be a Patreon on the blockchain not a viewly.
An ICO "at the same time" would be on the same day, and our ICO is not running on the same exact day as yours. The final factor is there is enough space in this market for plenty of similar projects, but in no way is our platform exactly similar to yours...JUST TRY OUR ALPHA.
Finally, as you are a content creator, and seem to love trolling the fuck out of us, we invite you to host your content on our platform since you are already familiar with its structure. We think you would adapt to it nicely.
Best Regards,
Your Friends at the Viuly Team
P.S.
Perhaps this Medium Article would put some of your concerns at ease.
Also please don't be afraid to join our Telegram Community. Our fast growing group of loyal fans and investors would love to hear what you have to say.
If Furion was indeed the creator . . . would you care to show proof of this? This is a pretty strange revelation if it were true . .
Hello @shawnfishbit,
It's a revelation for the Viuly staff, but apparently it's public knowledge here on steemit per the first few opening lines in this article by @furion's cohort @isacoin where they are continuing to bash our platform enjoyed by thousands of current users. He says,
This was actually news to us until we thought about how aggressive and passionate he has been to bash us every chance he gets and then we realized it was less about being a beacon of truth on the steemit platform and more about being the creator of Viewly.
please explain this to me:
Same number of likes again and again?