You misunderstand what observation means in quantum mechanics. If you research the matter, you will discover that the observation of a conscious being is not required for the effect you describe, just interaction.
Observation = interaction because there is no way to measure, detect, etc. a particle (or anything at all) without bouncing a photon off it or something. The significance being that doing so alters it in some way, which makes it impossible to study particles "as they are". The "observer" can be an instrument or even just another particle interacting with the one you mean to study.
Also, you start out by claiming that physics supports the existence of specifically the God of Christianity, but the rest of your post does not actually bear that out.
Even if your misunderstanding of quantum mechanics were accurate, it would support a creator deity, but there are countless religions with one or more of those. Your argument would be just as compatible with any of those religions as it is with your own.
You might consider breaking your post into paragraphs. As a wall of text, it is somewhat burdensome to read. Adding a picture to your post will also help more people notice it. I wrote a guide on how to do that here.
Btw, if you'd like to see what a good argument for the existence of God looks like, check this out. Then, to discover why it is not the God of the Bible, read this.
TY Alex, this was my first attempt to post anything I started with a more detailed longer post with paragraphs. I got a cryptic no go msg, that I thought was about post length. I now realize it won't accept 14 pt font.
I may have misunderstood what I've read about the Alain Aspect experiments, & the Schrodinger Cat model. It suggests that the wave state remains Potential until a Conscious Observer Interacts with the data collection process. Going to read your suggested post. TY again