It's all very well believing whatever myths and such you want, but you shouldn't be using the term 'logical' to define your belief; the words by their very nature do not go together
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It's all very well believing whatever myths and such you want, but you shouldn't be using the term 'logical' to define your belief; the words by their very nature do not go together
the myth is what you believe in that randomness can lead to system
Yes I know what logic means, and it ain't what you wrote above. But that's fine, as long as you acknowledge it's a different way of thought. The process of the Universe has for the most part been thoroughly explained in a way that does not contradict itself, other than the extreme fringes of knowledge; something we will reach eventually. It's just a matter of time.
Knowing how an iphone works doesn't make it makerless
Technology ≠ Nature
Intelligence is intellegence can't be the output of randomness
Who says? God? That's not logic - my point
logic
Do you basically know what LOGIC mean?