After Manchester, after French, after each terror attack this is the loop society wants us to stay in:
Problem-No solution- Same problem.
When a journalist ( im not even a big fan of her but thats not the issue here) tweets this:
So in other words is trying to move the debate going into solution thinking- shes being accused of being a nazi.
The response of the European leaders to terrorist attacks is mainly, that we need to continue with our normal way of life.
In other words we don't have to expect any reaction from European leaders . Carry on your life as normal, said Macron, "terrorist attacks will be part of our lives for years to come" .
The question now is, what would be a good response to stop global Islamist terrorism.
Maybe one step is to at least acknowledge that there is a problem!
Maybe the second step would be to not implement sharia laws in Europe, VS, and to admit that Sharia law (not the quran) has violent parts, parts that are literally being used by extremists.
Maybe to stop Saudi Arabia spreading wahhabism into Europe. Within Wahhabism there is no room for multi religions.We need reformers, spreading this kind of islam :
“We have appointed a law and a practice for every one of you. Had God willed, He would have made you a single community, but He wanted to test you regarding what has come to you. So compete with each other in doing good. Every one of you will return to God and He will inform you regarding the things about which you differed.” (Surat al-Ma’ida, 48)
Macron knows there will be attacks for years because that is the plan.
Hegelian dialectic. They'll keep allowing attacks to go on until the public demand the Orwellian nightmare they have planned for us. We need to say no more radical Islam but also no more loss of Liberty. A good start would be to stop destroying the Middle East and stop supporting Saudi Arabia and other despotic regimes.
yes to have more troupes at street ,the police, government super state. What do u think of Trumps deal with the Saudis. So Saudi Arabia promised they will help fight isis, but their country is a isis look a like ! is this strategically wise?
It's a huge deception, The Saudis and the US are ISIS. The only people truly trying to destroy ISIS are Russia & Syria with a bit from Turkey however they've only recently done a 180 when the saw the tide was turning towards Assad once Russia piled in. The majority of properly organised Jihadis have always been funded & trained by either the US or their proxies and used to topple whichever regime wasn't towing the line. Getting to your question, is it strategically wise? No, it's a shit idea however they don't have choice, they either double down or go home. It's going to end really badly for Saudi as the US will throw them under the bus when it's obvious it's over. They've been doing the same stuff for years.
Thanks for your reply .
Yea and Saudi Arabia get to say something about woman rights in the UN was it right? And Ivanka praising the women in Saudi Arabia and their feminism. I also wonder what Trump discussed with the pope
He probably asked him to pray for Ivanka as she's clearly brain dead!
lol
Katie Hopkins is an arse. There is no such thing as a final solution. It doesnt exist. Some people will always use violence to carry their agenda forwards.
I agree , on the other hand, calling for a solution doesn't mean push violence
No, but it does mean pushing some form of control. Maybe there are things we can do, but I doubt she will have any form of solution. She makes a living out of stirring the pot.
Congratulations @safforuler! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You published 4 posts in one day
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honnor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
If you want to support the SteemitBoard project, your upvote for this notification is welcome!