To ask me to go to Booster's transfer history and comb thru his "Received" amounts is a bit ridiculous!
First, I'd have to search for all the "Received" entries. Then I'd have to determine the time at which the bids were made, to see if they are made for this round or not. Then I'd have to calculate the total bid amounts.
I don't have time for that, nor does anyone else.
I suggest you go to SteemBotTracker, and there you can see which bid bots have a Min ROI that you find acceptable. Also, then you can time your bids appropriately, such that most of your bids will turn out profitable.
Here's the link ... https://steembottracker.com/#bid
Please familiarize yourself with that.
...
If you look at that, it states clearly that Booster's "Min ROI" is 0%. That means that you could NOT have "got a minus 70 ROI vote."
Sir booster wrote wrong in steembottracker. There is no minimum ROI in booster. If there is any minimum ROI then you will not got 10 steem loss. In 0% ROI, we will not in profit nor in the loss. But you have lost 10 steem even you got some free big votes. Just go https://steemworld.org/@majes.tytyty and check coming author rewards.
You send 50 and you got $16 upvote. How do you think that you will get any profit? For 50 steem, vote value should be $21 for getting 50 steem back. But you got $16 upvote and this is a huge loss.
I now see that the Booster's "Min ROI" is not functional. Thanks for the info.
But you should also be careful when you vote. The best way to ensure that you do not lose money is to use SteemBotTracker. To blame me for your loss is not very decent.
If you don't check the transfer history in the booster and everytime you send 50 steem in last 2 minutes then you will lose your money and other people money too who have already bid.
I'll just continue to use SteemBotTracker. I don't have time to comb thru anyone's transaction history. Nor the desire.
Thanks for your info.
I just stumbled on this debate and it is a very knotty argument. I understand your points quite well. They seem valid to an extent. Yet, I think the petitioners too have some valid concerns too. It all depends on perspectives. When next we chat, I will discuss this matter if I remember. In all, @booster is a cheat.
Yes, after I realized the full details, I sympathized with the petitioner(s). Let's chat about it soon.
I am online now, if you have little time.