I haven't started watching yet, but I like both approaches. Running as a candidate more than anything gets these ideas into the collective consciousness. The real change however, i think comes from technological innovations that make the current system obsolete. Such as bitcoin, steemit, bitnation, etc. crypto-anarchy is the idea that you design a system that makes violence ineffective and impotent, but anarchist political candidates still helps to get these ideas more exposure, which doesn't hurt anything, even though it doesn't actually change anything in itself. Okay, now to watch the debate. popcorn ready.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Which doesn't hurt? Have you never heard of "Divide et Impera"?
This attempted move by the suited up "anarchist" is exactly that, confusing and divisory.