You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why Bringing Assange Home Would Be The Best Possible Thing For Australia

in #julianassange7 years ago

I think it would be great if they just let him go home.

For the rest of your article, poor Caitlin and all her innocent Australians trying to absolved themselves of their own crimes against humanity, if their wasn't a air of snobbishness in that article I don't know what you'd call it then.

Sort:  
 7 years ago  Reveal Comment

I call it window dressing. Doesn't matter how you dress it up the fact remains that they did to those natives exactly what every country has done to other natives, doesn't matter how they got there it matters what they done afterwards and what they done is no less guilty then anybody else but since she writes, drives and thrives for a living on making every other country out of villainous occupying murders she has to first find a way to come to grips with their own guilt to absolve themselves. She should be ashamed to even try and use Assange as a image to absolve pass sins.

 7 years ago (edited) Reveal Comment

You seem to be the one who has a reading comprehension issue, she said:

"A bunch of white prisoners got thrown onto a gigantic island rich with ancient indigenous culture, we killed most of the continent's inhabitants and degraded and exploited the survivors, and now we're just kind of standing around drinking tea as the dust settles saying, "Hmm... well, we're not stuck-up like the Brits, and we're not entitled like the Yanks."

That to me is a clear indication she is talking about Australians overall view after that very descriptive manslaughter she just described. If that doesn't reek of stuck up and entitlement I certainly don't know what would. They felt entitled to kill off the natives then have a bit of tea?...then proclaim a difference of "air" between themselves and those who have done exactly the same thing. If that's not snobbishness I quite frankly couldn't tell you what would be. When you make a statement like that you own it, fair and square. She used "we're" not "they", there's a huge difference, one is inclusive of every bodies attitude from past leading to current, the other is applied to those long gone. I could give two rips about how you feel over what I stated, I have a right to my opinion and you certainly won't intimidate me out of it.


She's been fighting with me and others today as well and is impossible to reason with.You won't get anywhere with her @baah

Like they say what comes around goes around and she does it all the time when she incorporates the citizens of the US into the bastardly deeds of history, (don't make me waste my time going and looking for quotes directly pertaining to that because I will come back with them in my hand) just as her use of the word Yanks entailed every Yank.

You somehow think I don't like her, if I didn't like her I wouldn't follow her. I would consider her a learning curve on somethings but we are not always going to see eye to eye on everything. I absolutely will not stand by and let her explain away or distinguish any difference at all on crimes against humanity or use Assange to bring back the pride once lost to absolve anything, she wouldn't allow me to do it, not that I'd try, and I don't expect her to do.