All it takes to see the obvious is a moment of recognition.
Everyone that works for the government is any aspect or respect, directly or indirectly, is a servant of the people. This fact is obvious to anyone that believes in 'civilized society'. More so are those that swear oaths to serve and/or protect people in any aspect whatsoever. These individuals are ALWAYS bonded and insured. Judges, lawyers and law enforcement regardless of agency, firefighters, paramedics etc etc.
They are bonded and insured by the state that employs them with a scheme called 'Professional Performance Liability Insurance'. This is to protect the performing individual from any action against them in the event they are in fact liable for any damage to an individual or group as a result of them performing their duty as prescribed by the state of employ.
The assessment of legal liability is irrelevant here as people are not 'legal entities', they are living beings. This is a double-edged sword that people can use to debilitate and eventually destroy the financial 'powers that be' that think they own the world and everything and everyone on it.
'Money talks, bullshit walks', right?
Any time your 'servants' pass a law that does not serve your best interests, or you feel acts against them then it is a 'Fundamental Breach of Trust'. Any time a judge or cop or ANY 'servant' acts against the best interests of any individual, as assessed by that individual, then they are committing actionable 'Substantial Breach of Trust' and can be held liable for tort by you personally if there are damages of any type incurred. (loss of income due to jail time, loss of reputation as a professional due to an arrest at a protest, loss of property due to coercive extortion committed against you, quantifiable losses of any type, etc)
Now comes the meat to go with the potatoes.
FIND OUT what department of the local state provides PPLI for your public servants and write a letter detailing the actions taken against you, when, by whom, and in what capacity and then explain that any such actions taken against you in ANY capacity whatsoever is seen by you as a Substantial Breach of Trust, as you 'trust' your servants to protect you and act in your best interests. (true anarchists will know this to be a farce, but to those still plugged into the 'matrix' it will be unconscionable and will require remedy ASAP)
DO NOT bring this argument into any court of 'law', these BENCHES/BANKS will use the opportunity to effect a remedy against your best interests and seal the docket to protect themselves against any further action taken by you. Just create a BLUE INK HANDWRITTEN letter to whomever sits in whatever office that handles PPLI and basically file a claim against their Professional Performance Liability Insurance. (this name describes what it actually is, but the implementation in your area may have another name)
Doing this is GUARANTEED to get a nearly immediate response. I myself did this in Canada. I accused a 'Master of the Court of Queen's Bench' of Breach of Trust for orders against me made in a civil suit. I had the Minister of Justice HIMSELF call me at home to negotiate a settlement. (at the time i failed to recognize it for what it was and failed to handle it appropriately)
I hope many of you will find this information useful in everything from civil suits made against you on behalf of fictitious entities that do not exist and therefore cannot suffer tort or loss of any kind, to administrative offences claimed by the state (traffic tickets and bylaw infractions).
I even encourage the use of it in criminal cases where there is no victim other than you being aggressed by the state and law enforcement agents. Make your claims for the full amount of any PPLI policy, it will eventually become so expensive to pay it off or fight it out that the system will be forced to do something to mitigate the cause. The LAST thing any government wants is to defend against a Breach of Trust case in open court.
Why? the reason is the title of this article.
thanks for your interest and good luck in your endeavours.
Not bad, but hard to read with such a "design", it's ripped.
thanks, i'll edit it. i've never posted anything here before so the format has a bit of a learning curve to study.
yeap, editing this was a pain in the ass =-P
thanks for the input.
I know editing posts is super awkward at first but once you know the few basics that make the post much more aesthetically appealing and readable, it gets a lot more second-nature.
I also type at like 130wpm, so maybe I don't have room to talk. Not everyone types from home row at that speed, so I'm sure for lots of people this whole editting thing is much MORE frustrating and clunky.
I had to tap into my Myspace memory bank for HTML (dat ol' narcissistic teenage drive to learn how to make my profile page as obnoxious and glittery as possible!).
I'm glad you're here, Michael, and I want you to keep up the posts regularly, and interact with others and that way I can feature you in my next Eyes On The Minnows episode, and when people see you listed, they'll see an epic starting list of badass articles already there on your blog homepage. :)
Here's my Eyes On The Minnows post from today, for anyone reading this comment who wants to go follow and upvote some other little fishes (soon to be bigger fishes? :D)
https://steemit.com/steemit/@dragonanarchist/eyes-on-the-minnows-episode-2
thanks alot. i actually wrote this in notepad then copy/pasted expecting it to stay the same format lol my mistake.
Interesting information. Who specifically contacted you from the Justice Department? In Canada I thought the Crown itself bonds its state actors.
the Minister of Justice himself called me at home to offer settlement. they don't take this shit lightly at all.
it WORKS if appropriately worded. you'll need a highly intelligent wordsmith to help the layman craft a letter. a good lawyer might help, but you'd more than likely be hard pressed to find one willing to attack the foundation of their career.
it is the Risk Management division of provincial Finance that handles PPLI for the judiciary and i would presume for law enforcement as well, although verification would certainly be prudent.
thanks for your interest.
Congratulations @michael-joseph! You have received a personal award!
Click on the badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about this award, click here
Congratulations @michael-joseph! You received a personal award!
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!