I generally like your videos on youtube they have a lot of thought behind them. Unfortunately, this video by WeatherWar101 is so vague with such little evidence this seems like propaganda that would be put on CNN. I am basing my comment solely on this video alone. I do intend to view a few more by WeatherWar101 to see if he gives more evidence that I can at least search and verify elsewhere before I can give this theory any kinda of merit.
Claiming In-Place Sequential Water Vapor Generation but not showing any other evidence makes this theory very weak. Are there any satellite photos of structures in the spots he claims? If not what on earth could cause the massive about of water evaporations? One thing I can think of would be a nuclear power plant. I live near a nuclear power plant and can say it generates a good amount of evaporation but nothing like what WeatherWar101 is claiming in this video. What kind of power source would be needed to produce just one of the many "In-Place Sequential Water Vapor Generators"?
Yet again based on this video, to make those kinds of claims is wildly irresponsible. I do respect much of your work and content but this post is no where near your normal critical thinking videos. I have your posts here on Steemit on an auto up-voter. Based on my critical think of this post and the video I will be removing my up-vote.
I have watched a few more of WeatherWar101's videos on youtube. I would like to comment further on this theory which WeatherWar101 tries to make.
First Ill note that much of his videos on the theory are very vague. From my understanding, his theory is very similar to the Global Warming theory. In the Global Warming theory manmade CO2 is the cause of global warming. Which has shown to be very misrepresented. The really issue is how much of an affect does manmade CO2 have on a global level in temperature and weather patterns. The more evidence I see the more I feel we do have and impact but that impact is so extremely small its not really much of a concern. But this doesn't mean the sources of energy used to produce the add CO2 are not having other effects on the environment. The global warming theory or movement is very misleading CO2 is probably the least harmful thing amongst all the other chemicals released from the use of fossil fuels.
So WeatherWar101 theory to me seems to pose the same question. Some of the faculties on google maps that WeatherWar101 does show are vague at best. I am assuming they are mostly power plants. Not sure of the energy source used at these plants. So in WeatherWar101 theory these faculties produce water vapor. There is no doubt about it that manmade water vapor will have some affect, but how much of an affect?
I am sure someone much smart than I could go into the average math calculations for how much water vapor one of these plants could theoretically but into the atmosphere. From my simple point of view I doubt these plants could in theory make a hurricane let alone add multiple inches to its rain fall.
I can not come up with any examples because WeatherWar101 theory is so vague.
Is he claiming that manmade water vapor creates massive weather storms? I hope this is not his claim because the math I am sure would be to extreme for humans to be able to produce that much water vapor. Unless he is claiming there is some extremely secretive technology that far surpasses anything we have currently. Either way he really doesn't show any evidence to even make this remotely plausible.
Does his claims of manmade water vapor merely increase the magnitude of a storm? This has a better chance of being believable. Yet he is still to vague and does not even suggest a theoretical number of how much rain fall could be added to a storm. In the case of hurricane Harvey Are we looking at say an extra 10 inches of rain fall? This I feel would need to be theoretically calculated based on the amount of water vapor these facilities could produce and what the possible amounts of added rain fall they could have. I am assuming the total amount produced would be relatively close to the additional rain fall total. Even me throwing out the number 10 inches of added rain fall feels a bit far fetched.
The thing that raises my red flag with WeatherWar101's video he claims at the end Quoate "This channel remains, the only place you can find the actual and verifiable truth".
I like how WeatherWar101 shows the creation, or enlarging the volume, of excessive rainfall but I don't agree with the theories he has regarding the reason for the manipulation and the climate overall.
My best guess is that it is part of trying to sell us man made global warming. So they can point to all the flooding and say: see, just like we said, all a result of climate change. Plus an economical factor, minimizing the resources the average person has.
This video has a bit more substance to it, but makes the claim the earths weather patterns have been destroyed and all weather is man-made. I have no proof to absolutely say this is completely false. Yet these videos claim this is all fact but don't show any facts on how any of there theories could actually be mathematically possible.
Lets at least build some legs for this theory to stand on before such drastic claims are made. These 2 videos seem more like CNN videos that try and take the worst ideas someone could come up with to scare people for ratings.
Start with some theoretical math showing how much vapor some of these power plants and WSAC can produce along with the amount of energy needed. Here is a starting point. http://www.ctcombustion.com/oxc/sources/06-WaterVaporImpactsFinal2.pdf
Next show some studies for the claim that Doppler radar/Nexrad can steer clouds.
Lets at least quantify some of these ideas. Then you we begin to see if this theory even holds any merit.
I think the bold claims don't have merit at this point. I think there is much more merit in that humans contribute to a small amount of added water to the total rain fall. This is a very complicated subject by itself to prove let alone for these videos to claim humans control the entire earths weather.