You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: great new philosophy tube video

in #lgbt6 years ago (edited)

Dunno why you think people should be born knowing by heart every slur and insult. I'm not aware of the trans situation because I've never been involved in it. If my ignorance offends you, then that's too bad. Someone intolerant complaining about intolerance.

I don't have anything against you, but your hostility breaks any veneer of diplomacy that might exist here.

Sort:  

LOL, I was just making a joke based on the number one trending thing on twitter, the news and youtube.

Hmm, not sure you picked the best moment to make the joke then 😂 fuck off my serious thread. :3

I am just saying that over all, the topic of Kanye's password is more important to the world than this topic. It's drama. Has anyone answered your exploding banana question or is this topic being exploded and censored as it continues?

But at the same time, I'll make you notice one thing: The fact that you are trying to deviate the topic, and emphasise how "irrelevant" or "disinteresting" it is, makes it all the more relevant and interesting. It shows that you indeed have an interest in the topic or you would not be here, but you are uncomfortable with it, or you would not try to dismiss it.

And the fact that you'd say that a mere funny drama joke is more important (that I didn't know about, by the way, thanks for the tip) shows that the value you allot to this topic is one below normalcy, meaning that you feel something negative about it. You do feel an intimate connection with this topic, which is this negative feeling, and you want to make it go away to be more comfortable in your safe space.

I'm not particularly for/against any side here. I'm just showing you that your actions have a meaning different than the one your words imply.

Nope, you're reading way to far into it. I saw @trumpman was flagged over and over so I came to stir the pot. The topic could have been anything, lol.

Well, if it had been anything, you may not have wanted to outright dismiss it. But let's just make peace and start over. I'm Sharon! Nice to meet you. :3

Oh, I love talking with you. We have had a nice banter here all based on the fact I heard about 6 zero's on the radio today going to the doctors and you did not. I find that amazing and we have shown how to disagree, speak to each other and move on.

I never would have known about that stupid password if I didn't have a doctors appointment today, so meeting you and chatting made having to learn that was important news to the general public was worth it.

I have many LGB friends, not sure if I have ever met a T. I have also never heard it discussed with hatred or indifference except on social media and bias news outlets. That is why I love Steemit, people complain all the time but I never have to hear about it. I never knew Pepe the frog was racist until reading it on Steemit. I guess I am blessed to not spend much real time on social media outside of Steemit.

I can pop in and play devils advocate to any topic, I don't have thin skin. So if you ever need a topic wingman, just let me know.

Hmmm, censored? As long as nobody downvotes me to greyness or deletes the topic, I don't think it will be censored. Also, both are drama. Kanye's is just funny. Relevant to us? Don't think so. This post, however, touches the topic of an allegedly prevalent attitude on the blockchain that we could strive to observe.

I'm curious about human behaviour, so this whole topic is interesting to me. Kanye's thingy, though, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ people are dumb all the time. He's not famous for being bright.

There are quite a few replies greyed out in this thread. Which draws double the attention to them, so maybe it is backwards censorship more like advertising them to be read. I don't know. I guess you and the OP are having a genuine conversation or at least you are trying to. So I will stop trying to make light of the subject and let you carry on. I hope you get an answer as I have never heard tygertyger being a slur before either.

Two, to be exact (only on Steemit, not Busy, so I had to change platforms to notice/check this fact). And they're comments that are pretty much personally attacking the poster. That's what flags are for, right? Disagreeing with rewards, particularly on ill-intentioned entries.

They read like comments saying the poster has in the past made other comments that do not fit this posts narrative. There is also another user stating the same fact and their comments are not being downvoted.

When two people in the same comment section are saying the same thing and only one is down-voted what does that imply?