I agree on the side of argumentation. Calling someone a statist does nothing for that purpose. But I dont get what is your point against Larken besides him not being the best at arguing?
I'm 29 now, and ready to move on from such childish antics, honestly. I'm just waiting for manchildren like Larken Rose to finally grow up, as well, to the point of having mature conversations that don't include yelling and name calling.
becasue that sounds rather severe. And Larken for sure is not one of the people that blindly follow any trend in the anarchy crowd.
but I don't understand libertarians who take pride in the fact that they would happily watch their son drown in their neighbour's swimming pool because rescuing him would infringe upon the neighbour's property rights.
Is there actually anyone that makes that argument or are you just using childish communication to make your point?