People worried that without the government we wouldn't be safe; don't understand. If the developer of a housing estate was able to dictate the rules for that estate, they could make it so much safer than what we have now.
It could be a requirement that every resident has every other residents' personal details and criminal history, with a log of visitors; linked security/surveillance systems and a positive obligation to assist in an emergency. Complete silence between 9pm and 7am.
Dress code for putting the bins out. You name it.
People who want those things could buy in that estate and be far safer and more comfortable than they are now.
Of course, a different area/suburb could have completely different rules.
Clothes optional. Clothes banned. Cars banned, just houses and yards. You have to sell and move out at 30, to somebody under 25... it's endless.
We wouldn't have chaos, we'd just have choices.
I completely agree. There could be varying degrees of localities with their own forms of governance. Some authoritarian, others more libertarian. People raised by public schools are historically bad at being capable of independent thought and thinking beyond 2 or 3 choices. That's why we have Apple or Android, Pepsi or Coke, etc. There are varying degrees of acceptance of this variance in our "free" market, but the nature of these people is what has led us to this limited set of options within our so-called "free" society, which is far from free in my opinion.
😂yeah this is just how libertarians are. We just want to be left alone without having to ask the government to breathe. lol
Posted via D.Buzz