They are all the same, in that they believe governing others to be legitimate, but although I have said a statist is a statist, and "left" and "right" are not relevant, there are times it helps to know how the statist sees itself.
They differ on which superstitions drive them to that belief. If you want to focus on those specific delusions, or want to avoid them in "polite" conversation, it helps to know how they differ.
"Right" statists are dead serious over (their notion of) morality, honor, responsibility, culture-- or more generally what they see as the lack thereof in their enemies.
"Left" statists get weepy over fairness, safety, self-esteem-- or more generally over ways they think their enemies stomp on these "values".
Where they don't differ is that they both believe it's OK to force you to live by what they value, and kill you if you resist. Which is why I say they are all the same-- at least where it matters.
.
Thank you for helping support KentforLiberty.com.
Donations and subscriptions are always appreciated!
F**k Statists. I'm against their existence.
And yet they call Hitler - who was all about "fairness" and "equity" a right.
Fabulous inspiring content... I always follow you for such kinds of motivated content...@dullhawk
Awesome blog post sir very much informative thanks a lot sir have a great day.
This is amazing sir i hope a lot much more come from you have a great day.
Informative post sir thanks a lot for updating us sir.
Anarchism generally leads one to explore natural law; something statists have no reason to explore as they rely on mans law to work for them for some strange reason. A good understanding of natural law can (for some) encourage the aspiring anarchist to take the leap away from the slave mindset.
Just incredible blog sir,really loved it thanks a lot for sharing.
wow amazing sir i am a great fan to your blog posts,thanks a lot sir.
Thanks for sharing.