Do explain how not believing in the right to systematically violate rights makes zero sense.
I believe in rights, and the right to elect a centralized government is the right to infringe on the rights of others. THAT'S what makes zero sense. So, people who "believe in a centralized government" are actually the people who don't believe in rights.
Do you have the right to
-steal
-murder
-rape
-kidnap
-ect?
You know, things that are fundamentally the violation of rights.
If not, then how can you delegate a right that you yourself do not have?
Do explain how the systematic recognition of the rights/sovereignty of others (anarchy/voluntaryism) lends itself to centralization.