No. What I was saying is that it isn't a eugenics program that is reducing fertility. It is our modern habits. Have you got something against framing things with some levity, instead of outraged sophistry? Oh, and BTW, the causes I mentioned are actual scientific ones.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Levity is great when it doesn't get in the way of the facts. You might have missed he LMFAO and the comment about the vanishing storks. Levity is fine by me. Maybe you can explain to me where I've used sophistry, I doubt it. I don't feel outraged either. I'm only attempting to expand the discourse on this easily demonstrated connection between the control freaks who seek power and the use of any technique they can devise to limit the success of the competition, which is the rest of us. Eugenics programs do exist, and have for a long time, to deny this is a strong demonstration of deliberate denial.
Once again, I will point out that, while these, tight trousers and an overactive sex drive, may be two reasons that are established with use of the scientific method, they are far from the only reasons. Implying that all human infertility is caused only by tight pants and too much sex is to ignore the rest of the literature arrived at by the use of the scientific method. I didn't state that tight pants and too much sex are not reasons for infertility, simply that they are not close to the majority of the cause. There is plenty of scientific literature that supports this.