Your statements about the nonnviability of "Aerosol" technology do not run congruent with the facts that (the provided quotes) you've present. As a matter of fact, the debunk the very thrust the argument you're making.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The aerosol is still ruining our ozone layer.
If we want to stop global warming why are we damaging the only protection we have against the supposedly dangerous rays of the sun when not filtered through the ozone.
Thanks for commenting @deadsparrow
I don't think so @chron. The only evidence that is of any weight actual isn't an argument for the causes contributing to Ozone depletion but asthma.
So you suggest we poison our atmosphere to make it less hot?
You'll be hard put to find any place where I'm making such a suggestion. I'm saying there is an incoherence between your concern and the proof used
to legitimize your concerns, i.e. facts.
You seem to have equated some of those outlying and admitted problems (asthma) to mean they serve as evidence. That is an ill use of data.