My guess is that Trump will not be able to include everyone else in a NWO because these are several nation states that have become powerful, have an interest in a multipolar world and do not see themselves as imperialists because they have realised that every empire overstretches itself at some point. For some reason, certain political leading figures seem to detest purely imperialistic motifs.
The NWO is an ideology that even the Trump administration seems to disagree with. Even if everyone in government likes nothing better than to give themselves power, they also see that they had submitted to an internal power apparatus that both Reps and Dems have met in the past in such a way that they let it have its way.
This deep state creates a conflict. On the one hand, it is tempting to maintain it because of your own desire for power; on the other hand, you surrender to it by allowing it to exist and following its agenda. Trump is not a submissive person, he prefers to hold the reins himself; I think we'd agree on this.
The fact that states budgets are being frozen by Trump and that there are large-scale redundancies that are not intended (or so it is outlaid) of being replaced by the same number of his own people indicates that he is serious about slimming down the bureaucracy and putting an end to the waste of money.
A true deep-stater wouldn't care about any of that, I think. Even if Trump can be said to have a questionable character, it is perhaps precisely his vanity and his desire being loved by the people that makes him - so to speak by accident - a protector of what is left of the USA. Why would he want to continue, after having been nearly assassinated? For the money? Certainly not. I say it's for the history books.
I see both presidents, Trump and Putin, as the different sides of the same coin. One hot and the other cold in character. Both are the children of a past, where national identity played a bigger role. They cherish their culture (whatever maybe left of it) and seem to care for 'their people'. My interpretation.
If they were deep staters, why would they even bother to face these enormous obstacles, the annoyances, the media smears, keeping their lives endangered?
I think both personally hate lazy people, those who have no merit and did themselves never go through tough times. None of them seem to be fanatic socialists.
Now, that does not mean that us ordinaries will be kept safe from what is on the NWO agenda. Still, the system is not black and white and has overlaps. Just a reminder on the plandemic.
It remains to be interesting, to say the least. The future is not fully written out.
About the Palastinians. Trump, of course, makes the same mistake every powerful (or well fed) person does. He overestimates fiction in comparison with an existing reality - as strange as it may be. Expecting the out bombed Palestinians to just go away and settle somewhere else, like every other defeated folk might be willing to do (looking at the utter devastation of the cityscapes), they say "Now more than ever!"
These types of folks may not exist anywhere else in the world (I don't know) but since they knew and know nothing other than mostly hard times, they have another stance on making sacrifices.... for people like me, unimaginable. One just cannot make them doing what one wants them to do.
For this, they deserve respect but of course, one needs not to love them or their worldview.
I am reminded of Geronimo and the contest with the US cavalry they endured. The whole of the Apache tribe Geronimo led moved teepee, child, and grandma ~100 kilometers/day over terrain cavalry could not traverse, and continued to forage on the way in one of the most hostile environments on Earth, for five years.
Thanks!
Alex Krainer just reminded me of my own irritation I felt when I visited the US in the video I'm linking here. People there didn't seem to feel any pain or loss when they had to move somewhere else for a job, even if it was a thousand miles away. Families live apart from each other, scattered across the vast country. I never felt comfortable imagining that. I'm much more attached to where I live, and my family isn't so far away that a two-hour drive wouldn't be enough to overcome the distance.
With the Palestinians, I agree with you, it's more like the Apache tribe you described - they know the land, they know the soil, they know how to grow food and how to get by, and they are much more deeply rooted with their ancestors. I can empathise with that.
I am now. I was raised far from extended family, however, and didn't even understand what an uncle, cousin, or such concepts signified for most of my formative years. While I have no extended family I know, I have valuable relationships with friends and neighbors here today, and reckon such value of far greater worth to me than mere emuneration. I have had money and property and friends and goodwill, and the former can be taken from me. The latter cannot.
We couldn't have grown up more differently. I was brought up in a small town, surrounded by a huge number of relatives, with numerous aunts, uncles, cousins, my grandparents, as well as a large number of Russian-Germans who moved to the same place, although there are more of them all over the country. For me, it was normality to be embedded in this kind of community and I never really thought much about it until I realised that my normality was not the same for everyone else.
That is a good thing to be able to say. I congratulate you on this. To have confidence in the friends you made, is something not too many people can say of themselves.