If you base your opinion on the written history its okay, but what of archeological findings. Take dinosaurs for example, i believe we can both agree they exist right?
But dating their fossils show they are very old animals about 60-70 million years.
Well you might say, its a deduction so it might be right or wrong, that they might be younger than that, that is few thousand years old, maybe 4000 or 5000?.
If we both agree they exist, which i assume its logical, but they are young which is debatable, how come they are note found in any of the written facts you based your assumptions on?.
So i believe the earth is millions of years old if not billion
This is the reason why Science and Religion don't mix
@garokee It's not a matter of the two not mixing. It's a matter of what is absolutely true. God is not anti science at all. But when science tries to become God then we have a problem. Because science doesn't have all answers.
There's scientific things in the Bible. Gravity, curvature of Earth for example. This was waaaayy before being put in science textbooks.
Yes Dinos existed. How accurate are the dating methods and why do we still have dinosaur bones being found with soft tissue that is still alive if they were that old?
I would say yes they are around 5000 years old or more.
The Bible actually mentions a behemoth with a tail like a cedar tree. It is highly likely that it was describing a large dinosaur.