I've been asking other stakeholders, so I thought I'd get your opinion as well: Why do you flag "over-rewarded" posts after the fact, why not upvote "under-rewarded" posts first?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I've been asking other stakeholders, so I thought I'd get your opinion as well: Why do you flag "over-rewarded" posts after the fact, why not upvote "under-rewarded" posts first?
I imagine it has something to do with the rshare influence being higher on a highly voted post. Also the long term implications of certain posts trending on perceptions of value for new stakeholders.
I rarely do this, however I just happened to read and notice this one was paying out over $2/view. Nothing else to it...it's not a bad post, just overrewarded.
Because there are more bad posts on Steemit than good ones.
What is a "bad post"?
A post I don't like. I was speaking in general terms.
Heh. Well I guess it's an honest answer. Somewhat contemptuous, but honest.
hahahahaha :D:D:D :D :D :D now that is a serious accusation, but yeah I guess so if you weigh in everything we are starting to get the reposted video material, the memes, and all the other sparkles