<<To be a "good citizen" requires effort, work, sacrifice.>> good/bad citizen is stigmata. Totally illegal to even say.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
<<To be a "good citizen" requires effort, work, sacrifice.>> good/bad citizen is stigmata. Totally illegal to even say.
Illegal to say? Well I don't see that law written anywhere.
The fact is, consequences are not evenly distributed and opportunities are not evenly distributed. Since I'm not a stupid person; I can see that good and bad citizens do exist whether you want to accept it or not. The basis behind proving that existence is the uneven distribution of opportunities and consequences.
Show me the evidence you have for why it doesn't exist? Shouldn't all citizens receive the same exact opportunities and consequences? Since they don't; why is that? Why do some receive better treatment and others worse treatment?
Have u ever seen somebody depicted as a 'bad citizen' in official document? This is discrimination. On ideological grounds. Very harsh ones - ''what you do for the state, not what the state does for you''. With such ideologies raging the https://freeprivatecities.com/ will be a market uber-success !! Of course all citizens are equal in terms of legal consequences for their deeds. If some receive better or worse treatment this is called unjustice and inequality. And is against the law, corruption.