Keni, did you see my comment above? As stated the evidence is in our email correspondence. Please don't play these games. You already admitted in a separate comment in this thread that you made off with the money because of 'abuse' :
Quote:
- You gifted my partner in return for skype dates.
- You were abusive when she refused to meet fans in person.
End quote.
I have the emails as well as transactions records showing that I sent over 5 BTC. What gives you the right to make off with my money in this way? You decided I was "abusive," so you think it's okay to retain funds that were not appropriated in a fair or legal way. Beyond that, how does this possibly align with your so-called allegiance to 'wholesomeness', 'peace' and other such ideas that you promote as often as you do? Why are you being a complete asshole about this? Did you not read the above comment where I mentioned all the other things that was going on with me at the time. Did you YOURSELF not link the very article that mentioned I was under mental anguish during this very same period? Are you truly this inhumane? You KNOW, we both KNOW that you and Jamie made off with money that was not yours. Again, I'm happy to work this out in front of a 3rd party if need be, but why? Can't we both just be reasonable adults about this and work out a repayment arrangement?
I'm going to copy the message again below in case you didn't see it previously. Please respond to the points I made.
Please show some understanding and compassion for someone who is victim of mental illness. As said, I meant no offense or harm by any comments but, either way, none of this entitles you to simply make off with my money. I can certainly take this to the next level if we can work this out in a cordial manner.
Previous comment (PLEASE READ AND RESPOND TO THESE POINTS):
"Let's keep to facts."
Please. Let's.
"You quite clearly are not willing to communicate "decently", openly or factually."
Keni, I have made every attempt possible to communicate in a fair, productive and honest manner. I made several attempts to correspond privately (email, DM) with you but you blocked me on Twitter (and then claimed in a comment below that you didn't... [is it really necessary to provide a screenshot of this?].. I'm not even sure why you would lie about this to begin with).
"What is this "contract" you feel has been voided and where is your evidence?"
The contract is the email correspondence, which you already have a copy of, which I sent you several copies of a year and half ago. Jamie provided me with her hourly video rate and we provisioned an agreement on this price. Was her side of the agreement fulfilled? Obviously not. The one skype session we had didn't even last an hour (it was more along the lines of 40 minutes, I'll have to check skype history for the precise time). Therefore, the agreement is voided and the payment is to be refunded less the cost of the 40 minutes (or just round it up to an hour, I don't care). I'm not sure what's so hard to understand about this.
Let's use an analogous example to demonstrate how wrong this is: Let's say you hire a band to play 8 hours at a party you're hosting. The band gets there, plays for 30 minutes, gets in a disagreement with you, packs up and leaves 7.5 hours early... On what planet is it okay for the band to not abide by their side of the agreement and still walk away with the money anyhow? The band can charge for services rendered (30 minutes) and nothing more, the rest is to be refunded. The band can't just walk away with the money, which is exactly what you and Jamie did.
Beyond the illegality of it, is it okay to just walk away with someone's money? What version of ethics or morality validates this? Is it that surprising that you attempted to do so? Not really because money drives people to do unethical things, which is clearly the case here. I just don't understand how you can possibly spin this otherwise. It's my money, please return it less the ~45 minutes.
Furthermore, I sent you that news article via a DM on Twitter on my volition in order to make a personal plea to you that, at the time, I was also going through immense personal struggle and dealing with a mental illness crisis. As noted, in the article, I was sent to the hospital for treatment. I sent you this to show you that I was vulnerable at the time and figured you might sympathize and make this whole process easier. INSTEAD, you post it on your Steemit page in a clear attempt to bait your followers into disparaging me, all the while doxxing me. Wow. Was that really necessarily? Did you need to go as far as to pretend you just happened to Google my name and found the article by chance? I shared that with you (something I'm hesitant to share with anyone) in order to provide context and hopefully come to some mutual understanding. That you would use that as ammo to grandstand on your own Steemit page is just truly hateful. I'm not even sure what it has to do with anything? What were you trying to prove? What exactly do you mean when you say I'm "incriminating myself"? You realized I was already arrested and charged, right? Aren't you the big proponent of DMT anyway? Weren't you the one who was describing over email the exact steps you use to make it? Isn't this part of your spiritual practice? Seems highly disingenuous to slander me with this article. As I said, I was not myself during this time, which is how I landed in the hospital. You're painting a picture of me like I'm some career criminal, but I'm not, in fact I'm a solid person and do my part to help, not hurt, my community most of the time. I try to hold myself to high standard of morality and any lapse that occurred during this period 1.5 years ago does not demonstrate who I am as a person.
Let's not forget that you also told me via email that you spoke with your lawyer and they said that you could keep the funds. When I called you out on this and asked you to connect me or my lawyer with yours, you went entirely dark. I find it incredibly hard to believe that a lawyer would make such a ridiculous claim. Either way, if you truly think that your entitled to my money for no other reason than because you decided so, then we should take this in front of the appropriate mediator, arbitrator of judge because clearly a 3rd party is needed. I'm open to working this out either directly (preferable and much more convenient for both sides) or through a 3rd party, it's up to you.
In conclusion, there are two main points here.
You walked away with another person's money. There's no other way to spin this. It's not your money, it's not Jamie's money. It doesn't belong to you in any way, shape of form. You don't get to just decide that you're going to keep the money for your own reasons. There was an agreement and the agreement was never fulfilled. The outstanding funds are mine.
You took clear advantage of someone who was afflicted with a mental disorder. When I described this afterwards to you and sent you the relevant evidence, you, again didn't respond and used this personal info against me in a doxxing Steemit post to your followers.
Please just do the right thing. As described previously. Those funds were not entirely mine and there are a number of ongoing familial issues that require emergency funds, which I don't otherwise have. I need this back now more then ever. If you want to work out some sort of deal, I'm open to that as well. I apologized for the gross email language and assured you that I meant nothing personal by it, to your family. Please don't attempt to just walk off with my money and force me to take unnecessary additional steps to retrieve it. Let's just do this in the most cordial way possible and part as non-enemies. I don't hold any ill-will towards you, I just want/need my money back. Please show some compassion and understanding.
Sincerely
Furthermore, please delete the doxxing post. This is pure hate on your part. I don't deserve to be doxxed by you on Steamit. This is gross behavior and it doesn't even serve a point in your argument, it's a pure non-sequitur.
Looking forward to your response.
You're right Julian, what gave you the right to send your money in this way? How irresponsible and inhumane we must be, especially since you feel extra sad about it after the fact.
You're oblivious to all of your errors, sent further incriminating comments entwined with more abusive rants and only now after the fact are apologizing for your "gross email language" which was also threatening towards my son. We offered proof of your harassment and abusive messages as responses to your denial, that is all. Your weakness in attempting to rationalize your behavior with the abstract reference to consensual screen performances of known and liked professionals is yet more revealing of your own mind state than anyone else's. Some things you simply can not buy and we are not a band playing for your party example.
You are welcome to provide anything you like to support the contrary, however you and I both know, then there is no case to smear me. There was a clear window in time when we would have gladly sent everything back to you. Not because we were ever in any ethical, moral or legal obligation to do so. Simply because you are such a energetic drain on life. I've done my best to calmly answer all your questions and all you have done is further insult and abuse. You might know it costs some folk a lot of money to give that kind of crap and you're looking at the wrong entity right here.
Please enlighten me to what "doxxing" is to you? The understanding I have of this is by way of definition "doxxing: to search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent." In the US your details are public property, all evidence filed and notarized by a public officer is unless court sealed.
Exactly as I said, you came for me not the other way around. There is no malicious intent on our part. Simply sharing what it is we have had to deal with from you over the years. I would have gladly removed it the second you removed all of your accusations and lies about me. Now we have gone beyond 7 days it is safely stored in our comments history and will remain visible until down-voted, as well as preserved in our blockchain for future reference.
We did accept your gifts for dealing with your repeated and unwanted correspondence, also responsibly refused to make any further agreements with you. Your BTC transaction records will also help confirm by corresponding as per the email timeline. For the record the cycle goes like this; appointment, abusive emails, apologetic gifting, reschedule appointment, repeat. At no point were any contracts made and you have used up much more than your agreed time with either of us.
So feel free to continue with your opinions of me, my be life and actions. I will not be drawn into conceptual semantics about what was said or done. I will simply respond in self-defense against any of your abusive and slanderous comments. Likewise I will only provide hard evidence to back my claims and counter yours.
That's all I really have to say and much more than I am legally obliged to. Do you have any other points that you feel have been left unaddressed outside of unsubstantiated claims or personal opinion?
Wholeness is balance.
Just to provide some examples of the PizzaGate thing. You spread Alex Jones level nonsense that is clearly destructive the lives of children and takes the spotlight off of real threats all in the name of disparaging Hillary Clinton and an owner of a pizza restaurant. I don't use the word despicable much, but...
Then I again, I suppose you'll just spin this into some sort of slander against me or say I'm making the whole thing up... But, sure, I'm the one who's delusional...