Well if I was breaking a law and they found out then I'm guilty. It's as simple as that.
Fabricating evidence is wrong, that's very clear, but that is a different thing.
If someone did wrong to you and they got away just because they hid the evidence too well, would you be happy about that ?
Not fabricating evidence... recreating a false chain of custody for evidence. I'm saying the evidence can be real, but if it's illegally obtained then a proper trial can't be had because the state broke the law. But you're basically saying who cares, the person is guilty. but the system is guilty too, so you're all for one breaking the law but not the other.
If someone did wrong to me and they got away because the state broke the law and got the case tossed, I would be unhappy with the law-breaking state that promotes obedience to the law, but only for citizens, not cops judges or secret spy agencies.
I'm just saying your rant is misplaced. It should be against the government, not against those who benefit from the govt's inability to conduct itself "lawfully"