Quadratic rewards and 50/50 author/curator split were in the white paper, so this talk of 'making dangerous changes' is a little cute.
That said, I agree with what you're saying. It would be a mistake to change now.
I just also believe it was a mistake to change in the first place.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Is this you?. I enjoyed that video.
I lived through n^2 back in the day and I accepted it because I didn't know any better.
I remember I needed 10k SP to give away 1 cent. (with 40 votes a day).
The first time I could give away 1 cent I was so happy.
But I'm glad it changed (even though I probably would benefit a lot from n^2 now), linear is easier to explain and more fair in my opinion.
SMT's will give way to a whole experiment of economic models. It will be fun to see what people will come up with.
That's me :)
Fairness is subjective, and I don't think it should be one of our aims.
The lottery is the epitome of unfairness, and look how many people "play".
I remember posting before bed, and waking up in the morning crazy excited to see if my post had gone viral and made $10000.
It never happened, they were usually less than $1, but I'd given it my best and knew I'd hit the right note eventually.
Now I'm virtually guaranteed $20-$30, even if I throw out some low effort rubbish four times a day.
If I spend days tweaking and refining a single post, the most I can expect is $50.
That's hardly going to attract the best and brightest.
It's going to attract a factory worker mentality.
Clock in, clock out, get paid for your hours.
It might be 'fairer' but it's hardly overwhelming the platform with top quality content.
Ultimately as more authors arrive the quality will rise to the top, achieving the same effect; so it'll be less important as time goes by.
Fair points. You can already see many with the 'clock in, clock out' mentality, and this is where I dislike blaming the rewards model and shying away from social behavior.
Not sure a change will fix anything, but am very much looking forward to the future here where hopefully, my stake will be going out to some awesome projects and growing the blockchain that way.
SMTs will let us pit some of these ideas against each other, too.
The steem blockchain is just the foundation; the competing structures can all be built on top; then we can see if ideas that work in theory actually work in practice.
For sure. It's been a tough few months, especially if you are in contact which many smaller accounts, but I can see light ahead and am feeling confident that these competing structures will be a good thing for all of us.
You just need a long memory. I first bought in at 50c, and watched the price drop to 7c.
HODL. Not just a catchphrase.
I was actually chatting to the man at the top of the post last night about those times - sounded brutal - well done for not exiting down there!
My account predates those times, but my increased activity didn't start until early 2017, where (hopefully) the worst was and is over.
50c doesn't sound so bad now eh :D