We both concscienciously refused vaccinating our boy.
The ingredients are too harmful and the science is not without influence from the financial interests of the pharmaceutical companies and their profit margins.
We both concscienciously refused vaccinating our boy.
The ingredients are too harmful and the science is not without influence from the financial interests of the pharmaceutical companies and their profit margins.
Exactly, the same reason we chose not to vaccinate our children. But, like I said above, it is no one's job to force people to make decisions either way. However, the government is doing just that.... in spite of all the coverups and conflicts of interest.
Any medical professional who believes that it is justified to inject known neurotoxins, antibiotics, antigens, preservatives, adjuvants, stabilizers, buffers, emulsifiers, polysorbate 80, aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, live viruses, egg protein, human DNA, human cell lines from aborted infants, and protein from human blood into any person to prevent any disease is completely misguided, misinformed, deluded and ignorant of any logic regarding human health.
"In 1993 a high court judge in the UK decided that it was impossible to know the exact contents of vaccines and that science had no idea what the cocktail of chemicals, contaminants and heavy metals contained in vaccines could do to the human body, or why they would work to prevent disease." -- British Medical Journal, 1993.
Amen