Maybe not "us all". The quoted researchers may want to take a look at the research being done by George Webb and Mark Kulacz, who discovered much the same activities over two years ago. Mr Webb has already written at least one short book about it.
Mr Kulacz has an interesting theory in that the proles, rather than being killed, are being set up to become "lab monkeys" or "lab mice" for experimentation by those in power. After all, lab monkeys aren't cheap and although animal testing is useful, no animal corresponds exactly with the human genome. This push toward homogenizing our food by eliminating local food sources and restricting movement via "green" directives like ULEZ and "15-minute cities" as well as various attempts to control human breeding, makes it seem like those in power plan to put the proles in "cages" and feed the proles all the same food in an attempt to eliminate variance and make experimental data more accurate. Of course, those in power may feel that 8 billion lab monkeys aren't necessary and pose a problem for the push toward homogeneity, and thus kill off those not useful for experimentation.
I agree that this is only definitive proof from the mouths of the plotters themselves, and was known to most capable of connecting the dots much earlier. I also agree, and believe I have previously stated, that the wide variability of the formulations of the jabs indicate that the jabdemic was a massive test of experimental medical devices, not a ubiquitous murder tool intended to genocide humanity.
As to Kulacz's thoughts on standardizing our habitat and fare, it is not without merit, and something I had not previously considered. It certainly makes sense.
I have pointed out that the plandemic tested many different formulations on many different populations and that whatever has been discovered via those tests will likely be applied in the next plandemic. I don't think merely killing everyone off is a reasonable goal, as there are quite a few mechanisms less complex, difficult, and expensive that would facilitate ubiquitous mortality. I think there are multiple outcomes the conspirators (and a variety of plots and plotters) desire to achieve, and the low mortality suggest that is merely an acceptable failure rate.
I very much appreciate your bringing these facts to my attention. It was George Webb's reporting that initially brought Steemit to my awareness, and I only stopped following him when he undertook to speak for Mossad, which I found unpalatable.
Thanks!
Edit: given the impossibility of completely securing humanity in 15 minute prisons, or any of the proposed hazards to universally succeed, there will be populations that will surmount all of them and survive. However, all of us, individually, are going to die. No exceptions.